ArticleJAMIA open2024
Association of patient photographs and reduced retract-and-reorder events.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) is a potentially dangerous medical error. It remains unknown if patient photographs reduce WPOE in the pediatric inpatient population. Materials and Methods: Order sessions from a single pediatric hospital system were examined for retract-and-reorder (RAR) events, a surrogate WPOE measure. We determined the association of patient photographs with the proportion of order sessions resulting in a RAR event, adjusted for patient, provider, and ordering context. Results: In multivariable analysis, the presence of a patient photo in the electronic health record was associated with 40% lower odds of a RAR event (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75), while cardiac and ICU contexts had higher RAR frequency (aOR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.69-2.67 and 2.05, 95% CI: 1.71-2.45, respectively). Discussion and Conclusion: Patient photos were associated with lower odds of RAR events in the pediatric inpatient setting, while high acuity locations may be at higher risk. Patient photographs may reduce WPOE without interruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.