Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2024

An investigation of a novel milk allergy-friendly food supplement program.

Michael A Golding, Manvir Bhamra, Zoe Harbottle, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Jennifer D Gerdts, Leslie E Roos, Elissa M Abrams, Sara J Penner, Jo-Anne St-Vincent, Jennifer L P Protudjer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NOURISH-US: a mixed-methods, randomized crossover study of a program designed to reduce the financial burden of food allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael A GoldingThe Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Manvir BhamraThe Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Zoe HarbottleThe Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Moshe Ben-ShoshanDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jennifer D GerdtsFood Allergy Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Leslie E RoosDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Elissa M AbramsThe Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sara J PennerDepartment of Business and Administration, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jo-Anne St-VincentChildren's Allergy and Asthma Education Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jennifer L P ProtudjerThe Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Compared to households not managing food allergy, households managing food allergy are faced with greater direct and indirect costs. To address these cost burdens, we developed and piloted a milk allergy-friendly food supplement program for lower- and middle-income households managing a dairy allergy in a child age <6 years. Herein, we aimed to evaluate to the impact of this program on food costs, food security, and caregiver mental health using a longitudinal design. Methods: Participants living in or near the city of Winnipeg, in Manitoba, Canada were recruited from January to February 2022 via social media, word-of-mouth, and a database maintained by the principal investigator. Consenting participants took part in a 6-month allergen-friendly food supplement program that provided them with biweekly deliveries of allergen-friendly foods free of charge. To evaluate the impact of the program on food costs, food security, and well-being, participants completed a series of questionnaires at baseline, mid-point, and at the end of the program. Changes in these variables were assessed via a series of Friedman tests. Results: The final sample was comprised of 8 households. Relative to baseline, participants reported higher total direct food costs at midpoint (+5.6%) and endpoint (+13.5%), but these changes did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, total indirect food costs decreased over the course of the study relative to baseline (midpoint = -28.2%; endpoint = -18.5%), but the changes were not found to be statistically significant. Participants did, however, report a statistically significant decrease in costs related to lost time from work or school as a result of their child's food allergy at endpoint relative to baseline (-100%). Few changes in food security, caregiver well-being, or child food allergy quality of life were noted. Discussion: The provision of allergen-friendly foods helped keep grocery costs below the pace of inflation. Participants also reported reduced costs associated with missed time from work or school as a result of their child's food allergy. Despite these encouraging findings, a relatively high proportion of the current sample reported experiencing food insecurity throughout the study period, suggesting that additional financial support for families is needed.

Indexed as

cost of illness/food hypersensitivitydairy allergyfood hypersensitivityfood securityinterventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38957544
PMCPMC11217183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.