Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957528›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024

An At-Home Laparoscopic Curriculum for Junior Residents in Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology, and Urology.

Riley Brian, David Bayne, Traci Ito, Jeannette Lager, Anya Edwards, Sandhya Kumar, Ian Soriano, Patricia O'Sullivan, Julian Varas, Hueylan Chern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Asynchronous Technical Feedback: A Workshop for Training Surgical Instructors.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Riley BrianResearch Resident, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.ORCID 0000-0002-7462-3214
David BayneAssistant Professor, Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Traci ItoAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Jeannette LagerProfessor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Anya EdwardsFirst-Year Resident, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Sandhya KumarAssistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Ian SorianoAssociate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Patricia O'SullivanProfessor, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Julian VarasAssociate Professor, Surgical Division, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Hueylan ChernProfessor, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery requires significant training, and prior studies have shown that surgical residents lack key laparoscopic skills. Many educators have implemented simulation curricula to improve laparoscopic training. Given limited time for dedicated, in-person simulation center practice, at-home training has emerged as a possible mechanism by which to expand training and promote practice. There remains a gap in published at-home laparoscopic curricula employing embedded feedback mechanisms. Methods: We developed a nine-task at-home laparoscopic curriculum and an end-of-curriculum assessment following Kern's six-step approach. We implemented the curriculum over 4 months with first- to third-year residents. Results: Of 47 invited residents from general surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology, 37 (79%) participated in the at-home curriculum, and 25 (53%) participated in the end-of-curriculum assessment. Residents who participated in the at-home curriculum completed a median of six of nine tasks (interquartile range: 3-8). Twenty-two residents (47%) responded to a postcurriculum survey. Of these, 19 (86%) reported that their laparoscopic skills improved through completion of the curriculum, and the same 19 (86%) felt that the curriculum should be continued for future residents. Residents who completed more at-home curriculum tasks scored higher on the end-of-curriculum assessment ( Discussion: This learner-centered laparoscopic curriculum provides guiding examples, spaced practice, feedback, and graduated skill development to enable junior residents to improve their laparoscopic skills in a low-stakes, at-home environment.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumGynecologyInternship and ResidencyLaparoscopyObstetricsUrologyEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesAsynchronous PracticeHome PracticeLaparoscopic SimulationOB/GYNSimulationSurgery - GeneralUrology

Identifiers

PMID38957528
PMCPMC11219092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.