ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
ChatGPT: perspectives from human-computer interaction and psychology.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot randomized controlled trial of AI-delivered vs. human-delivered iCBT for depression in young adults.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Factors influencing college student intention to use ChatGPT with an integrated TAM and IDT model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Human Shadows in Machine Minds: Quantitative Study Interpreting AI Responses to the Rorschach Test.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Assessment of the efficacy of ChatGPT responses to bacterial species-specific questions in microbiology.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Benchmark analysis of myopia-related issues using large language models: a comparison of ChatGPT-4o and deepseek.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) in psychotherapy: A challenging frontier.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Exploration of Mehrabian's communication model with an android.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The digital interactive design of mirror painting under transformer based intelligent rendering methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of physician and large language model chatbot responses to online ear, nose, and throat inquiries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Advancing Emotionally Aware Child-Robot Interaction with Biophysical Data and Insight-Driven Affective Computing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pilot Study on AI Image Analysis for Lower-Limb Reconstruction-Assessing ChatGPT-4's Recommendations in Comparison to Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons and Resident Physicians.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishing a real-time biomarker-to-LLM interface: a modular pipeline for HRV signal acquisition, processing, and physiological state interpretation via generative AI.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Role of Synchronous, Moderated, and Anonymous Peer Support Chats on Reducing Momentary Loneliness in Older Adults: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Observational
- Factors shaping the adoption of large language models among hospital administrative staff: A cross-sectional survey study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The release of GPT-4 has garnered widespread attention across various fields, signaling the impending widespread adoption and application of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, previous research has predominantly focused on the technical principles of ChatGPT and its social impact, overlooking its effects on human-computer interaction and user psychology. This paper explores the multifaceted impacts of ChatGPT on human-computer interaction, psychology, and society through a literature review. The author investigates ChatGPT's technical foundation, including its Transformer architecture and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) process, enabling it to generate human-like responses. In terms of human-computer interaction, the author studies the significant improvements GPT models bring to conversational interfaces. The analysis extends to psychological impacts, weighing the potential of ChatGPT to mimic human empathy and support learning against the risks of reduced interpersonal connections. In the commercial and social domains, the paper discusses the applications of ChatGPT in customer service and social services, highlighting the improvements in efficiency and challenges such as privacy issues. Finally, the author offers predictions and recommendations for ChatGPT's future development directions and its impact on social relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.