ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Enhancing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Artery Disease Management.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of health professionals' perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in radiology: a questionnaire-based study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiographyWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in coronary CT angiography: transforming the diagnosis and risk stratification of atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Predictors of Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Detecting Coronary Artery Stenosis by Preprocedural CT Angiography in Patients Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in coronary CT angiography (CCTA), a key tool for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Because CAD is still a major cause of death worldwide, effective and accurate diagnostic methods are required to identify and manage the condition. CCTA certainly is a noninvasive alternative for diagnosing CAD, but it requires a large amount of data as input. We intend to discuss the idea of incorporating AI into CCTA, which enhances its diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency. Using such AI technologies as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) tools, CCTA images are automated to perfection and the analysis is significantly refined. It enables the characterization of a plaque, assesses the severity of the stenosis, and makes more accurate risk stratifications than traditional methods, with pinpoint accuracy. Automating routine tasks through AI-driven CCTA will reduce the radiologists' workload considerably, which is a standard benefit of such technologies. More importantly, it would enable radiologists to allocate more time and expertise to complex cases, thereby improving overall patient care. However, the field of AI in CCTA is not without its challenges, which include data protection, algorithm transparency, as well as criteria for standardization encoding. Despite such obstacles, it appears that the integration of AI technology into CCTA in the future holds great promise for keeping CAD itself in check, thereby aiding the fight against this disease and begetting better clinical outcomes and more optimized modes of healthcare. Future research on AI algorithms for CCTA, making ethical use of AI, and thereby overcoming the technical and clinical barriers to widespread adoption of this new tool, will hopefully pave the way for profound AI-driven transformations in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.