ArticleCureus2024
Modified Radiological Union Score of Tibia (RUST) Scores in Diaphyseal Fractures Treated by the Ilizarov Frame: A Retrospective Analysis Evaluating Reliability.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The number of cases of tibia diaphyseal fractures treated by Ilizarov fixation is increasing. Fractures with infective etiology and altered bone biology due to the requirement of revision surgery or open wounds, which are often treated by the Ilizarov method, have challenges in ascertaining radiological signs of union. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the application of the modified Radiological Union Score of Tibia (m-RUST) scores in the assessment of fracture union in patients operated by the Ilizarov method. The secondary aim is to assess the interobserver and intraobserver variability of the m-RUST score validated by orthopaedicians and radiologists. Methodology A total of 119 patients who were treated with an Ilizarov fixator from February 2017 to December 2023 were included in the study. Four observers (two orthopaedicians and two radiologists) independently applied the m-RUST score for the included patients. Clinical data were not disclosed to the observers who worked independently of each other. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the reliability of the m-RUST score. Interobserver reliability was measured by examining the scores of four observers from the second assessment, and intra-observer variability was assessed by a repeat evaluation after two weeks following the first assessment. Results The m-RUST score of the 119 X-rays analysed ranged from 8 to 16. The mean score in the first assessment was 11.36±3.51, and in the second assessment was 11.42±3.39. The reliability between all the observers was "substantial agreement" (ICC: 0.74, 95% CI). The ICC among the orthopaedicians was 0.77 and that among the radiologists was 0.72. Conclusion The m-RUST score has potential in other long bone fractures such as femur or humerus. Assessment of the m-RUST score in the healing of infective sequel and bone grafting conditions has been found effective. The m-RUST score is a dependable score in evaluating union in tibia fractures treated by the Ilizarov frame.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.