Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38957187›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Investigating the neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on human cognition: current issues and potential solutions.

Marcus Meinzer, Alireza Shahbabaie, Daria Antonenko, Felix Blankenburg, Rico Fischer, Gesa Hartwigsen, Michael A Nitsche, Shu-Chen Li, Axel Thielscher, Dagmar Timmann and 16 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. 2 mA is NOT 2 mA: Electric field variability in high-definition tDCS and its implications for precision neuromodulation in aging.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Marcus Meinzer *Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Alireza Shahbabaie *Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Daria AntonenkoDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Felix BlankenburgNeurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rico FischerDepartment of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Gesa HartwigsenMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Shu-Chen LiChair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Axel ThielscherSection for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dagmar WaltemathCore Unit Data Integration Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Mohamed AbdelmotalebDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Harun KocataşDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Leonardo M Caisachana GuevaraDepartment of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Giorgi BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Miro GrundeiNeurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Teresa CunhaSection for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Dayana HayekDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Sabrina TurkerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Frederik SchlittDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Yiquan ShiChair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Asad KhanDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Michael BurkeDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Steffen RiemannDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Filip NiemannDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied extensively for its potential to enhance human cognitive functions in healthy individuals and to treat cognitive impairment in various clinical populations. However, little is known about how tDCS modulates the neural networks supporting cognition and the complex interplay with mediating factors that may explain the frequently observed variability of stimulation effects within and between studies. Moreover, research in this field has been characterized by substantial methodological variability, frequent lack of rigorous experimental control and small sample sizes, thereby limiting the generalizability of findings and translational potential of tDCS. The present manuscript aims to delineate how these important issues can be addressed within a neuroimaging context, to reveal the neural underpinnings, predictors and mediators of tDCS-induced behavioral modulation. We will focus on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), because it allows the investigation of tDCS effects with excellent spatial precision and sufficient temporal resolution across the entire brain. Moreover, high resolution structural imaging data can be acquired for precise localization of stimulation effects, verification of electrode positions on the scalp and realistic current modeling based on individual head and brain anatomy. However, the general principles outlined in this review will also be applicable to other imaging modalities. Following an introduction to the overall state-of-the-art in this field, we will discuss in more detail the underlying causes of variability in previous tDCS studies. Moreover, we will elaborate on design considerations for tDCS-fMRI studies, optimization of tDCS and imaging protocols and how to assure high-level experimental control. Two additional sections address the pressing need for more systematic investigation of tDCS effects across the healthy human lifespan and implications for tDCS studies in age-associated disease, and potential benefits of establishing large-scale, multidisciplinary consortia for more coordinated tDCS research in the future. We hope that this review will contribute to more coordinated, methodologically sound, transparent and reproducible research in this field. Ultimately, our aim is to facilitate a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which tDCS modulates human cognitive functions and more effective and individually tailored translational and clinical applications of this technique in the future.

Indexed as

cognitionconsortiadesign optimizationexperimental controllifespantDCS-fMRItESvariability

Identifiers

PMID38957187
PMCPMC11218740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.