Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956889›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2024

Validity of the five-item mental health inventory for screening current mood and anxiety disorders in the general population.

Margreet Ten Have, Marja J H Van Bon-Martens, Frederiek Schouten, Saskia Van Dorsselaer, Laura Shields-Zeeman, Annemarie I Luik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Association between Depression and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Polyps: A Prospective Cohort Study from the Nurses' Health Study II.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Determinants of the willingness to reduce or quit cocaine use among nightlife attendees.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margreet Ten HaveTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-2199
Marja J H Van Bon-MartensTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frederiek SchoutenRijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Saskia Van DorsselaerTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Laura Shields-ZeemanTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Annemarie I LuikTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) is frequently used as a screener for mood and anxiety disorders. However, few population-based studies have validated it against a diagnostic instrument assessing disorders following current diagnostic criteria.

methodsWithin the third Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS-3), a representative population-based study of adults (N = 6194; age: 18-75 years), the MHI-5 was used to measure general mental ill-health in the past month. Presence of mood (major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder, or bipolar disorder) and anxiety disorders (panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, or generalized anxiety disorder) in the past month was assessed with a slightly modified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders-5.

resultsThe MHI-5 was good to excellent at distinguishing people with and without a mood disorder, an anxiety disorder, and any mood or anxiety disorder. The cut-off value associated with the highest sensitivity and highest specificity for mood disorder was ≤68, and ≤76 for an anxiety disorder or any mood or anxiety disorder.

conclusionsThe MHI-5 can identify individuals at high risk of a current mood or anxiety disorder in the general population when diagnostic interviews are too time consuming.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMood DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adultanxiety disordersgeneral populationmood disordersscreeningsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID38956889
PMCPMC11219508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.