Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956803›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2024

Are we tackle ready? Cross-sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union.

Kathryn Dane, Stephen W West, Sharief Hendricks, Ciaran Simms, Nicol van Dyk, Will Connors, Fiona Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Breast-Related Issues in Community-Based Women's Rugby Union.European journal of sport science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn DaneDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-6278
Stephen W WestDepartment of Health, Centre for Health, and Injury & Illness Prevention in Sport, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-7000
Sharief HendricksDivision of Physiological Sciences and Health through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sport Research Centre, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-6266
Ciaran SimmsDepartment of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Biomedical Engineering & Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5564-1620
Nicol van DykHigh Performance Unit, Irish Rugby Football Union, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5997
Will ConnorsSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona WilsonDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-1087

Funding

Irish Research Council [GOIPG/2020/1220]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tackle contest is the most common and most injurious match contact event in rugby and is an indicator of performance. Tackle Ready is World Rugby's tackle technique education program. Limited research has characterized the tackle contest in women's rugby. The purpose of this study is to: (1) identify the match situational characteristics, ball-carrier and tackler technical actions demonstrated in elite women's Rugby Union and (2) to determine the extent to which Tackle Ready recommended tackle techniques were exhibited. Technical characteristics for 1500 tackle events in the 2022-2023 Women's Six Nations Championship were visually assessed according to a predefined coding framework and the Tackle Ready program. Tackles lacked full completion (0.2%) of the 22 coded Tackle Ready techniques with 47% of the recommended techniques demonstrated in each tackle on average (range 15%-98%). A high proportion of tackles involved two defenders (48%), approaching ball-carriers from the side (38%) or oblique angles (39%), in an upright position (30%), and with initial contact made with the arm (51%). Incorrect pre-contact head positioning and head placement upon contact accounted for 50% and 15% of tackles, respectively, and there was a mean of 14 (95% CI 11-18) head and neck contacts to a tackler and 18 (95% CI 14-22) head and neck contacts to a ball-carrier per game. Targeted interventions to encourage adoption of recommended techniques are needed to reduce tackle-related injury risk in women's rugby. This study provides valuable context for future discussion across law enforcement, coach education and gender-specific tackle coaching in the women's game.

Indexed as

FootballVideo RecordingAthletic PerformanceCompetitive BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansball‐carryrugby uniontacklevideo analysiswomen

Identifiers

PMID38956803
PMCPMC11235850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.