Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956723›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2024

Predictive modeling of perioperative patient deterioration: combining unanticipated ICU admissions and mortality for improved risk prediction.

Tom H G F Bakkes, Eveline H J Mestrom, Nassim Ourahou, Uzay Kaymak, Paulo J de Andrade Serra, Massimo Mischi, Arthur R Bouwman, Simona Turco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tom H G F BakkesElectrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. t.h.g.f.bakkes@tue.nl.
Eveline H J MestromAnesthesiology, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Nassim OurahouAnesthesiology, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Uzay KaymakElectrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Paulo J de Andrade SerraMathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Massimo MischiElectrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Arthur R BouwmanElectrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Simona TurcoElectrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper presents a comprehensive analysis of perioperative patient deterioration by developing predictive models that evaluate unanticipated ICU admissions and in-hospital mortality both as distinct and combined outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWith less than 1% of cases resulting in at least one of these outcomes, we investigated 98 features to identify their role in predicting patient deterioration, using univariate analyses. Additionally, multivariate analyses were performed by employing logistic regression (LR) with LASSO regularization. We also assessed classification models, including non-linear classifiers like Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, and XGBoost.

resultsDuring evaluation, careful attention was paid to the data imbalance therefore multiple evaluation metrics were used, which are less sensitive to imbalance. These metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristics, precision-recall and kappa curves, and the precision, sensitivity, kappa, and F1-score. Combining unanticipated ICU admissions and mortality into a single outcome improved predictive performance overall. However, this led to reduced accuracy in predicting individual forms of deterioration, with LR showing the best performance for the combined prediction. DISCUSSION: The study underscores the significance of specific perioperative features in predicting patient deterioration, especially revealed by univariate analysis. Importantly, interpretable models like logistic regression outperformed complex classifiers, suggesting their practicality. Especially, when combined in an ensemble model for predicting multiple forms of deterioration. These findings were mostly limited by the large imbalance in data as post-operative deterioration is a rare occurrence. Future research should therefore focus on capturing more deterioration events and possibly extending validation to multi-center studies.

conclusionsThis work demonstrates the potential for accurate prediction of perioperative patient deterioration, highlighting the importance of several perioperative features and the practicality of interpretable models like logistic regression, and ensemble models for the prediction of several outcome types. In future clinical practice these data-driven prediction models might form the basis for post-operative risk stratification by providing an evidence-based assessment of risk.

Indexed as

In-hospital mortalityMultivariate analysisPerioperative patient deteriorationPredictive modelingUnanticipated ICU admissionUnivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID38956723
PMCPMC11220961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.