Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956686›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2024

Prognostic significance of hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score in breast cancer: a propensity score-matching study.

Tongchao Jiang, Haishuang Sun, Shuyu Xue, Tiankai Xu, Wen Xia, Ying Wang, Ling Guo, Huanxin Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Revealing the prognostic landscape of hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score in patients with lung cancer: a pooled analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tongchao Jiang *Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Haishuang Sun *Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Shuyu XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Tiankai XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Wen XiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China. wangying2@sysucc.org.cn.
Ling GuoDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China. guoling@sysucc.org.cn.
Huanxin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China. linhx@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773103The National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China 82102838The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515010685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score functions as a comprehensive index that assesses the systemic inflammatory response, nutritional, and immune status. This study aimed to explore the relationship between preoperative HALP score and the prognosis of BC patients and to develop predictive nomograms.

methodsClinicopathological data were collected for BC patients who underwent mastectomy between December 2010 and April 2014 from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The optimal cutoff value for HALP was determined by maximally selected rank statistics for overall survival data. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to develop comparable cohorts of high-HALP group and low-HALP group. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of HALP on BC patients. Prognostic nomograms were developed based on the multivariate Cox regression method. Then, the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curves analysis (DCA) were applied to evaluate the prognostic performance of the nomograms.

resultsA total of 1,856 patients were included as the primary cohort, and 1,470 patients were matched and considered as the PSM cohort. In the primary cohort, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates for high-HALP group (≥ 47.89) and low-HALP group (< 47.89) were 94.4% vs. 91.0% (P = 0.005) and 87.8% vs. 82.1% (P = 0.005), respectively. Similar results were observed in PSM cohort (5-year OS, 94.3% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.015; 5-year PFS, 87.5% vs. 83.2%, P = 0.036). Notably, multivariate Cox regression analysis in the PSM cohort showed that HALP could independently predict BC patient prognosis in both OS (HR: 0.596, 95%CI [0.405-0.875], P = 0.008) and PFS (HR: 0.707, 95%CI [0.538-0.930], P = 0.013). OS and PFS nomograms showed excellent predictive performance with the C-indexes of 0.783 and 0.720, respectively. The calibration plots and DCA also indicated the good predictability of the nomograms. Finally, subgroup analysis further demonstrated a favorable impact of HALP on both OS and PFS.

conclusionPreoperative HALP score can be used as a reliable independent predictor of OS and PFS in BC patients, and the nomograms may provide a personalized treatment strategy.

Indexed as

BiomarkerBreast cancerHALP scorePrognosticSurvival

Identifiers

PMID38956686
PMCPMC11218366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.