Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956604›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2024

Integrative multi-omics analysis unravels the host response landscape and reveals a serum protein panel for early prognosis prediction for ARDS.

Mengna Lin, Feixiang Xu, Jian Sun, Jianfeng Song, Yao Shen, Su Lu, Hailin Ding, Lulu Lan, Chen Chen, Wen Ma and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mengna Lin *Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Feixiang Xu *Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianfeng SongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yao ShenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Su LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hailin DingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lulu LanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wen MaSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xueling WuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. wuxueling76@126.com.
Zhenju SongShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. song.zhenju@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Weibing WangShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. wwb@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2501800National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072214Science and Technology of Shanghai Committee 23Y31900100Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project ZD2021CY001Shanghai New Three-year Action Plan for Public Health GWVI-11.1-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multidimensional biological mechanisms underpinning acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continue to be elucidated, and early biomarkers for predicting ARDS prognosis are yet to be identified.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter observational study, profiling the 4D-DIA proteomics and global metabolomics of serum samples collected from patients at the initial stage of ARDS, alongside samples from both disease control and healthy control groups. We identified 28-day prognosis biomarkers of ARDS in the discovery cohort using the LASSO method, fold change analysis, and the Boruta algorithm. The candidate biomarkers were validated through parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) targeted mass spectrometry in an external validation cohort. Machine learning models were applied to explore the biomarkers of ARDS prognosis.

resultsIn the discovery cohort, comprising 130 adult ARDS patients (mean age 72.5, 74.6% male), 33 disease controls, and 33 healthy controls, distinct proteomic and metabolic signatures were identified to differentiate ARDS from both control groups. Pathway analysis highlighted the upregulated sphingolipid signaling pathway as a key contributor to the pathological mechanisms underlying ARDS. MAP2K1 emerged as the hub protein, facilitating interactions with various biological functions within this pathway. Additionally, the metabolite sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was closely associated with ARDS and its prognosis. Our research further highlights essential pathways contributing to the deceased ARDS, such as the downregulation of hematopoietic cell lineage and calcium signaling pathways, contrasted with the upregulation of the unfolded protein response and glycolysis. In particular, GAPDH and ENO1, critical enzymes in glycolysis, showed the highest interaction degree in the protein-protein interaction network of ARDS. In the discovery cohort, a panel of 36 proteins was identified as candidate biomarkers, with 8 proteins (VCAM1, LDHB, MSN, FLG2, TAGLN2, LMNA, MBL2, and LBP) demonstrating significant consistency in an independent validation cohort of 183 patients (mean age 72.6 years, 73.2% male), confirmed by PRM assay. The protein-based model exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to the clinical model in both the discovery cohort (AUC: 0.893 vs. 0.784; Delong test, P < 0.001) and the validation cohort (AUC: 0.802 vs. 0.738; Delong test, P  = 0.008).

interpretationOur multi-omics study demonstrated the potential biological mechanism and therapy targets in ARDS. This study unveiled several novel predictive biomarkers and established a validated prediction model for the poor prognosis of ARDS, offering valuable insights into the prognosis of individuals with ARDS.

Indexed as

BiomarkersRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overBlood ProteinsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedMultiomicsPrognosisProteomicsBiomarkersBlood ProteinsARDSMachine learningMetabolomicsMulti-omicsPrognosis modelProteomics

Identifiers

PMID38956604
PMCPMC11218270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.