Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956589›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Hypermethylated TAGMe as a universal-cancer-only methylation marker and its application in diagnosis and recurrence monitoring of urothelial carcinoma.

Zhicong Yang, Qing Chen, Shihua Dong, Peng Xu, Wanxiang Zheng, Zhanrui Mao, Chengchen Qian, Xiangyi Zheng, Lihe Dai, Chengyang Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhicong Yang *Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital and Cancer Metastasis Institute and Laboratory of RNA Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qing Chen *Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shihua Dong *Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital and Cancer Metastasis Institute and Laboratory of RNA Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peng Xu *Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital and Cancer Metastasis Institute and Laboratory of RNA Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wanxiang ZhengDepartment of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Zhanrui MaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital and Cancer Metastasis Institute and Laboratory of RNA Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chengchen QianShanghai Epiprobe Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Xiangyi ZhengShanghai Epiprobe Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Lihe DaiDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chengyang WangShanghai Epiprobe Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Haoqing ShiDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Bioinformatics, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jianlin YuanDepartment of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. jianliny@fmmu.edu.cn.
Wenqiang YuShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital and Cancer Metastasis Institute and Laboratory of RNA Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. wenqiangyu@fudan.edu.cn.
Chuanliang XuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. chuanliang_xu@126.com.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC1005004National Key R&D Program of China 2022BEG01003National Natural Science Foundation of China 31671308National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872814National Natural Science Foundation of China 32000505National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270645National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572509National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772720National Natural Science Foundation of China 81802515National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272950Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 16411969700Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 17411950900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrothelial carcinoma (UC) is the second most common urological malignancy. Despite numerous molecular markers have been evaluated during the past decades, no urothelial markers for diagnosis and recurrence monitoring have shown consistent clinical utility.

methodsThe methylation level of tissue samples from public database and clinical collected were analyzed. Patients with UC and benign diseases of the urinary system (BUD) were enrolled to establish TAGMe (TAG of Methylation) assessment in a training cohort (n = 567) using restriction enzyme-based bisulfite-free qPCR. The performance of TAGMe assessment was further verified in the validation cohort (n = 198). Urine samples from 57 UC patients undergoing postoperative surveillance were collected monthly for six months after surgery to assess the TAGMe methylation.

resultsWe identified TAGMe as a potentially novel Universal-Cancer-Only Methylation (UCOM) marker was hypermethylated in multi-type cancers and investigated its application in UC. Restriction enzyme-based bisulfite-free qPCR was used for detection, and the results of which were consistent with gold standard pyrosequencing. Importantly, hypermethylated TAGMe showed excellent sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI: 81.4-94.1%) and specificity of 90.0% (95% CI: 81.9-95.3%) in efficiently distinguishing UC from BUD patients in urine and also performed well in different clinical scenarios of UC. Moreover, the abnormality of TAGMe as an indicator of recurrence might precede clinical recurrence by three months to one year, which provided an invaluable time window for timely and effective intervention to prevent UC upstaging.

conclusionTAGMe assessment based on a novel single target in urine is effective and easy to perform in UC diagnosis and recurrence monitoring, which may reduce the burden of cystoscopy. Trial registration ChiCTR2100052507. Registered on 30 October 2021.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkers, TumorMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsTMEFF2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38956589
PMCPMC11218302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.