Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956559›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Patterns and trends in melanoma mortality in the United States, 1999-2020.

Alexander J Didier, Swamroop V Nandwani, Dean Watkins, Alan M Fahoury, Andrew Campbell, Daniel J Craig, Divya Vijendra, Nancy Parquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Geographic variation in the impact of novel melanoma therapies on mortality.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. MYC as a key target for melanoma therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of cytotoxic, anti-oxidant, and apoptotic effects ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander J DidierThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA. adidier@rockets.utoledo.edu.
Swamroop V NandwaniThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Dean WatkinsThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Alan M FahouryThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Andrew CampbellThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Daniel J CraigThe University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Divya VijendraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.
Nancy ParquetDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMelanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, has witnessed a notable increase in incidence over the past decades. Despite advancements in treatment, it remains a significant cause of cancer mortality. Understanding demographic trends and variations in melanoma mortality is crucial for addressing disparities and implementing effective interventions.

methodsUsing the Centers for Disease Control Wide Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database, we analyzed melanoma mortality data in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Data were stratified by demographic and regional variables, and age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated. Descriptive analysis was performed and Joinpoint regression analysis was employed to identify temporal trends.

resultsBetween 1999 and 2020, there were 184,416 melanoma-related deaths in the United States Overall, the age-adjusted mortality rate declined from 2.7 to 2.0 per 100,000 people at a rate of -1.3% annually, with significant variations across demographic groups and regions. Men, non-Hispanic White individuals, and those aged > 65 experienced higher mortality rates. Non-Hispanic White individuals noted the steepest decrease in AAMR after 2013 at a rate of -6.1% annually. Disparities were seen by geographic density, with rural populations exhibiting higher mortality compared to their urban and suburban counterparts.

conclusionThe study highlights a significant reduction in melanoma mortality in the U.S. since 2013, potentially attributed to advancements in diagnostic techniques such as dermoscopy and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Disparities persist, particularly among rural populations. Targeted interventions focusing on increased screening and education are warranted to further mitigate melanoma mortality and address demographic disparities.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRural PopulationUnited StatesYoung AdultDermoscopyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaMorbidityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38956559
PMCPMC11221171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.