Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956538›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical imaging2024

Classification, detection, and segmentation performance of image-based AI in intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.

Zhiyue Zhou, Yuxuan Jin, Haili Ye, Xiaoqing Zhang, Jiang Liu, Wenyong Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Software-based simulation for pipeline vantage flow diverter preprocedural assessment: Method and validation study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhiyue Zhou *School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yuxuan Jin *School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Haili Ye *Research Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoqing ZhangResearch Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. 11930927@mail.sustech.edu.cn.
Jiang LiuResearch Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. liuj@sustech.edu.cn.
Wenyong ZhangSchool of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. zhangwy@sustech.edu.cn.

Funding

Teaching Reform Engineering Project of Undergraduate Universities in Guangdong Province (2022) SJZLGC202211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection and management of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are vital to prevent life-threatening complications like subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Artificial Intelligence (AI) can analyze medical images, like CTA or MRA, spotting nuances possibly overlooked by humans. Early detection facilitates timely interventions and improved outcomes. Moreover, AI algorithms offer quantitative data on aneurysm attributes, aiding in long-term monitoring and assessing rupture risks.

methodsWe screened four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE and Scopus) for studies using artificial intelligence algorithms to identify IA. Based on algorithmic methodologies, we categorized them into classification, segmentation, detection and combined, and then their merits and shortcomings are compared. Subsequently, we elucidate potential challenges that contemporary algorithms might encounter within real-world clinical diagnostic contexts. Then we outline prospective research trajectories and underscore key concerns in this evolving field.

resultsForty-seven studies of IA recognition based on AI were included based on search and screening criteria. The retrospective results represent that current studies can identify IA in different modal images and predict their risk of rupture and blockage. In clinical diagnosis, AI can effectively improve the diagnostic accuracy of IA and reduce missed detection and false positives.

conclusionsThe AI algorithm can detect unobtrusive IA more accurately in communicating arteries and cavernous sinus arteries to avoid further expansion. In addition, analyzing aneurysm rupture and blockage before and after surgery can help doctors plan treatment and reduce the uncertainties in the treatment process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceIntracranial AneurysmHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyIntracranial aneurysm, Artificial intelligence, Medical imaging

Identifiers

PMID38956538
PMCPMC11218239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.