Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956442›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Enhancing efficiency of protein language models with minimal wet-lab data through few-shot learning.

Ziyi Zhou, Liang Zhang, Yuanxi Yu, Banghao Wu, Mingchen Li, Liang Hong, Pan Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. ADAPT: a programme for the advanced detection of AI-enabled pathogenic threats.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ziyi Zhou *School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Liang Zhang *School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yuanxi Yu *School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8682-5529
Banghao Wu *School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Mingchen LiShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, 200232, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6862-0052
Liang HongSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. hongl3liang@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0107-336X
Pan TanSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. tpan1039@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2086-0940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately modeling the protein fitness landscapes holds great importance for protein engineering. Pre-trained protein language models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in predicting protein fitness without wet-lab experimental data, but their accuracy and interpretability remain limited. On the other hand, traditional supervised deep learning models require abundant labeled training examples for performance improvements, posing a practical barrier. In this work, we introduce FSFP, a training strategy that can effectively optimize protein language models under extreme data scarcity for fitness prediction. By combining meta-transfer learning, learning to rank, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning, FSFP can significantly boost the performance of various protein language models using merely tens of labeled single-site mutants from the target protein. In silico benchmarks across 87 deep mutational scanning datasets demonstrate FSFP's superiority over both unsupervised and supervised baselines. Furthermore, we successfully apply FSFP to engineer the Phi29 DNA polymerase through wet-lab experiments, achieving a 25% increase in the positive rate. These results underscore the potential of our approach in aiding AI-guided protein engineering.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDeep LearningDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseModels, MolecularMutationProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseProteins

Identifiers

PMID38956442
PMCPMC11219809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.