ReviewNature communications2024
Improving laboratory animal genetic reporting: LAG-R guidelines.
Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies for Optimizing Genetic Mouse Models to Enhance the Understanding of Parkinson's Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Improve genetic quality control to increase rigor and reproducibility of mouse research.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- DSS Colitis Model: Traps, Tricks, and Reporting Recommendations.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A quality framework for cryopreserved rodent disease models: INFRAFRONTIER quality principles in EMMA archiving and distribution.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Review
- The Status and Emerging Developments in Laboratory Animal Science in Asia since 9th AFLAS Congress (2023) until 10th AFLAS Congress (2025).Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Birth of offspring derived from cryopreserved rat sperm after shipment in a Styrofoam box at -80°C.Experimental animals · 2025Article
- Article
- Generation of a Ym1 deficient mouse utilising CRISPR-Cas9 in CB6 embryos.Transgenic research · 2025Article
- Genome engineering with Cas9 and AAV repair templates, successes and pitfalls.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Review
- Article
- The mouse metabolic phenotyping center (MMPC) live consortium: an NIH resource for in vivo characterization of mouse models of diabetes and obesity.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024Review
- The mutant mouse resource and research center (MMRRC) consortium: the US-based public mouse repository system.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024Review
- Animal Models of Human Pathology: Revision, Relevance and Refinements.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The updated mouse universal genotyping array bioinformatic pipeline improves genetic QC in laboratory mice.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biomedical research community addresses reproducibility challenges in animal studies through standardized nomenclature, improved experimental design, transparent reporting, data sharing, and centralized repositories. The ARRIVE guidelines outline documentation standards for laboratory animals in experiments, but genetic information is often incomplete. To remedy this, we propose the Laboratory Animal Genetic Reporting (LAG-R) framework. LAG-R aims to document animals' genetic makeup in scientific publications, providing essential details for replication and appropriate model use. While verifying complete genetic compositions may be impractical, better reporting and validation efforts enhance reliability of research. LAG-R standardization will bolster reproducibility, peer review, and overall scientific rigor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.