ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring self-reported visual function and vision-related anxiety in patients with RPGR-associated retinal degeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Stargardt Disease: Correlation With Functional and Structural Findings.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Mental health outcomes in patients with inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Article
- Patient-Reported Social Impact of Molecularly Confirmed Macular Dystrophies and Cone-Rod Dystrophies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship between the full-field stimulus test and self-reported visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: REPEAT Study report No. 3.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Social Impact of Molecularly Confirmed Retinitis Pigmentosa.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Self-reported visual function and in-depth swept-source optical coherence tomography features of cystoid macular edema in retinitis pigmentosa.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variants in the retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene are responsible for the majority of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa cases, which not only affects male patients but also some heterozygous females. Vision-related disability and anxiety of patients with RPGR-associated retinal degeneration have never been explored before. This study aimed to evaluate self-reported visual function and vision-related anxiety in a Portuguese cohort of male and female patients with RPGR-associated retinal degeneration using two validated patient-reported outcome measures. Cross-sectional data of thirty-two genetically-tested patients was examined, including scores of the Michigan retinal degeneration questionnaire (MRDQ) and Michigan vision-related anxiety questionnaire. Patients were classified according to retinal phenotypes in males (M), females with male phenotype (FM), and females with radial or focal pattern. Both M and FM revealed higher rod-function and cone-function anxiety scores (p < 0.017). Most MRDQ disability scores were higher in M and FM (p < 0.004). Overall, positive correlations (p < 0.004) were found between every MRDQ domain and both anxiety scores. In RPGR-associated retinal degeneration, males and females with male phenotype show similar levels of increased vision-related anxiety and disability. Every MRDQ visual function domain showed a strong correlation with anxiety scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.