Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956227›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2024

Identifying behaviour-related and physiological risk factors for suicide attempts in the UK Biobank.

Bei Zhang, Jia You, Edmund T Rolls, Xiang Wang, Jujiao Kang, Yuzhu Li, Ruohan Zhang, Wei Zhang, Huifu Wang, Shitong Xiang and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When Losses Matter More: A Dynamic Reference-Dependent Evaluation of Suicide Risk.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Linking the exposome to the brain-behaviour phenotype.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mapping the genetic landscape of suicide risk: Insights from genomic SEM.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bei ZhangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-7534
Jia YouInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7079-8041
Edmund T RollsInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-1292
Xiang WangMedical Psychological Centre, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jujiao KangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-7281
Yuzhu LiInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ruohan ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-1939
Wei ZhangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huifu WangDepartment of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shitong XiangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-4714
Chun ShenInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuchao JiangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-0559
Chao XieInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jintai YuInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-383X
Wei ChengInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. wcheng@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-1743
Jianfeng FengInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jianfeng64@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-2258

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M710804National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82071997Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 2018SHZDZX01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a global public health challenge, yet considerable uncertainty remains regarding the associations of both behaviour-related and physiological factors with suicide attempts (SA). Here we first estimated polygenic risk scores (PRS) for SA in 334,706 UK Biobank participants and conducted phenome-wide association analyses considering 2,291 factors. We identified 246 (63.07%) behaviour-related and 200 (10.41%, encompassing neuroimaging, blood and metabolic biomarkers, and proteins) physiological factors significantly associated with SA-PRS, with robust associations observed in lifestyle factors and mental health. Further case-control analyses involving 3,558 SA cases and 149,976 controls mirrored behaviour-related associations observed with SA-PRS. Moreover, Mendelian randomization analyses supported a potential causal effect of liability to 58 factors on SA, such as age at first intercourse, neuroticism, smoking, overall health rating and depression. Notably, machine-learning classification models based on behaviour-related factors exhibited high discriminative accuracy in distinguishing those with and without SA (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.909 ± 0.006). This study provides comprehensive insights into diverse risk factors for SA, shedding light on potential avenues for targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksMultifactorial InheritanceSuicide, AttemptedAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMachine LearningMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID38956227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.