Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38956215›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Electrical stimulation enhances sciatic nerve regeneration using a silk-based conductive scaffold beyond traditional nerve guide conduits.

Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Ashkan Azimzadeh, Saman Behboodi Tanourlouee, Melina Mamdoohi, Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh, Konstantin V Slavin, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Zahra Hassannejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alireza Soltani KhaboushanPediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Gene, Cell and Tissue Research Institute, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 62, Dr. Gharib's Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733151, Iran.
Ashkan AzimzadehPediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Gene, Cell and Tissue Research Institute, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 62, Dr. Gharib's Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733151, Iran.
Saman Behboodi TanourloueePediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Gene, Cell and Tissue Research Institute, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 62, Dr. Gharib's Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733151, Iran.
Melina MamdoohiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.
Abdol-Mohammad KajbafzadehPediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Gene, Cell and Tissue Research Institute, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 62, Dr. Gharib's Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733151, Iran.
Konstantin V SlavinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vafa Rahimi-MovagharSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hassan-Abad Square, Imam Khomeini Ave., Tehran, 11365-3876, Iran. v_rahimi@tums.ac.ir.
Zahra HassannejadPediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Gene, Cell and Tissue Research Institute, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 62, Dr. Gharib's Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, 1419733151, Iran. zhassannejad@tums.ac.ir.

Funding

National Institute for Medical Research Development 977083Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 98-02-84-43515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advancements in peripheral nerve regeneration, the creation of nerve conduits with chemical and physical cues to enhance glial cell function and support axonal growth remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the impact of electrical stimulation (ES) using a conductive nerve conduit on sciatic nerve regeneration in a rat model with transection injury. The study involved the fabrication of conductive nerve conduits using silk fibroin and Au nanoparticles (AuNPs). Collagen hydrogel loaded with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) served as the filling for the conduit. Both conductive and non-conductive conduits were applied with and without ES in rat models. Locomotor recovery was assessed using walking track analysis. Histological evaluations were performed using H&E, luxol fast blue staining and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, TEM analysis was conducted to distinguish various ultrastructural aspects of sciatic tissue. In the ES + conductive conduit group, higher S100 (p < 0.0001) and neurofilament (p < 0.001) expression was seen after 6 weeks. Ultrastructural evaluations showed that conductive scaffolds with ES minimized Wallerian degeneration. Furthermore, the conductive conduit with ES group demonstrated significantly increased myelin sheet thickness and decreased G. ratio compared to the autograft. Immunofluorescent images confirmed the presence of GFP-positive ADSCs by the 6th week. Locomotor recovery assessments revealed improved function in the conductive conduit with ES group compared to the control group and groups without ES. These results show that a Silk/AuNPs conduit filled with ADSC-seeded collagen hydrogel can function as a nerve conduit, aiding in the restoration of substantial gaps in the sciatic nerve with ES. Histological and locomotor evaluations indicated that ES had a greater impact on functional recovery compared to using a conductive conduit alone, although the use of conductive conduits did enhance the effects of ES.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationSciatic NerveTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsElectric StimulationFibroinsGoldGuided Tissue RegenerationHydrogelsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMetal NanoparticlesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionSilkFibroinsGoldHydrogelsSilkConductive conduitElectrical stimulationNerve repairStem cells

Identifiers

PMID38956215
PMCPMC11219763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.