ArticleScientific reports2024
Electrical stimulation enhances sciatic nerve regeneration using a silk-based conductive scaffold beyond traditional nerve guide conduits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum-induced recovery of proliferative capacity and differentiation potential in aged dental pulp stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Conductive Biopolymer-Based 3D Bioprinted Nerve Conduit in Sciatic Nerve Injury Repair.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Integrating Cells, Biomaterials, and Advanced Engineering for Next-Generation Peripheral Nerve Repair.Cells, tissues, organs · 2026Review
- Stem Cell-based Nerve Regenerative Therapies: The Role of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs) in Preventing Nerve Adhesions and Promoting Axonal Nerve Repair.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Electrical Stimulation and Platelet-Rich Plasma as Complementary Approaches for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Rolipram and Electrical Stimulation Synergistically Promote Neuronal Differentiation of Adipose-derived Stromal Cells: an in Vitro Study.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Article
- Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Conductive MeCbl/PEDOT:PSS/HA hydrogels with electrical stimulation for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- From innovation to clinic: Emerging strategies harnessing electrically conductive polymers to enhance electrically stimulated peripheral nerve repair.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Review on electrical stimulation combined with electroactive biomaterials to promote peripheral nerve regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in peripheral nerve regeneration, the creation of nerve conduits with chemical and physical cues to enhance glial cell function and support axonal growth remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the impact of electrical stimulation (ES) using a conductive nerve conduit on sciatic nerve regeneration in a rat model with transection injury. The study involved the fabrication of conductive nerve conduits using silk fibroin and Au nanoparticles (AuNPs). Collagen hydrogel loaded with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) served as the filling for the conduit. Both conductive and non-conductive conduits were applied with and without ES in rat models. Locomotor recovery was assessed using walking track analysis. Histological evaluations were performed using H&E, luxol fast blue staining and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, TEM analysis was conducted to distinguish various ultrastructural aspects of sciatic tissue. In the ES + conductive conduit group, higher S100 (p < 0.0001) and neurofilament (p < 0.001) expression was seen after 6 weeks. Ultrastructural evaluations showed that conductive scaffolds with ES minimized Wallerian degeneration. Furthermore, the conductive conduit with ES group demonstrated significantly increased myelin sheet thickness and decreased G. ratio compared to the autograft. Immunofluorescent images confirmed the presence of GFP-positive ADSCs by the 6th week. Locomotor recovery assessments revealed improved function in the conductive conduit with ES group compared to the control group and groups without ES. These results show that a Silk/AuNPs conduit filled with ADSC-seeded collagen hydrogel can function as a nerve conduit, aiding in the restoration of substantial gaps in the sciatic nerve with ES. Histological and locomotor evaluations indicated that ES had a greater impact on functional recovery compared to using a conductive conduit alone, although the use of conductive conduits did enhance the effects of ES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.