Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955989›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Sensorimotor learning during synchronous speech is modulated by the acoustics of the other voice.

Abigail R Bradshaw, Emma D Wheeler, Carolyn McGettigan, Daniel R Lametti

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail R BradshawMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. abbie.bradshaw@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Emma D WheelerDepartment of Psychology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Carolyn McGettiganDepartment of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel R LamettiDepartment of Psychology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust ECF-2021-207Leverhulme Trust RL-2016-013Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2019-05236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that speaking with other voices can influence sensorimotor predictions of one's own voice. Real-time manipulations of auditory feedback were used to drive sensorimotor adaptation in speech, while participants spoke sentences in synchrony with another voice, a task known to induce implicit imitation (phonetic convergence). The acoustic-phonetic properties of the other voice were manipulated between groups, such that convergence with it would either oppose (incongruent group, n = 15) or align with (congruent group, n = 16) speech motor adaptation. As predicted, significantly greater adaptation was seen in the congruent compared to the incongruent group. This suggests the use of shared sensory targets in speech for predicting the sensory outcomes of both the actions of others (speech perception) and the actions of the self (speech production). This finding has important implications for wider theories of shared predictive mechanisms across perception and action, such as active inference.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryLearningSpeechSpeech PerceptionVoiceAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultSensorimotor learningSpeech perceptionSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID38955989
PMCPMC11836077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.