Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955986›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of behavioral health services & research2024

Clinical Variables Associated with Successful Treatment of Depression or Anxiety in Collaborative Care.

Carol Hardy, Brandn Green, Virna Little, Karl Vanderwood

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carol HardyJG Research & Evaluation, Bozeman, MT, USA. carol@jgresearch.org.ORCID 0009-0004-8338-0375
Brandn GreenJG Research & Evaluation, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Virna LittleConcert Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Karl VanderwoodJG Research & Evaluation, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative Care, an evidence-based model, has proven effective in treating depression and anxiety in healthcare settings. However, limited attention has been paid to exploring treatment outcome differences by clinical variables and diagnosis within this model. While previous research suggests that early and frequent contacts and swift treatment access lead to positive outcomes for depression and anxiety, these aspects have not been comprehensively examined in Collaborative Care. This study investigates the impact of clinical variables on treatment completion in patients primarily diagnosed with anxiety or depression who received collaborative care treatment as a treatment program. Analysis was completed as an observational study of patients (n =2018) with behavioral health diagnoses spanning from 2016 to 2023. Classification analysis offers insights into optimal practices for implementing Collaborative Care across diverse healthcare populations from pediatric to geriatric. Identifying clinical characteristics associated with successful treatment in Collaborative Care has far-reaching implications for model adoption and enhancing patient outcomes. Across all results, patients who received more clinical support and had shorter enrollment durations showed a strong association with successful treatment completion.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAdolescentAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnxietyCollaborative careDepressionTreatment success

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.