Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955952›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2024

Gene Therapies in Clinical Development to Treat Retinal Disorders.

Michelle E McClements, Maram E A Abdalla Elsayed, Lauren Major, Cristina Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara, Robert E MacLaren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cell therapy for age-related macular degeneration.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Optogenetic vision restoration in the face of secondary and tertiary remodeling in the rd1 mouse retina.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle E McClementsNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK. maclaren@eye.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-4464
Maram E A Abdalla ElsayedNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Lauren MajorNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Cristina Martinez-Fernandez de la CamaraNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapies have emerged as promising treatments in clinical development for various retinal disorders, offering hope to patients with inherited degenerative eye conditions. Several gene therapies have already shown remarkable success in clinical trials, with significant improvements observed in visual acuity and the preservation of retinal function. A multitude of gene therapies have now been delivered safely in human clinical trials for a wide range of inherited retinal disorders but there are some gaps in the reported trial data. Some of the most exciting treatment options are not under peer review and information is only available in press release form. Whilst many trials appear to have delivered good outcomes of safety, others have failed to meet primary endpoints and therefore not proceeded to phase III. Despite this, such trials have enabled researchers to learn how best to assess and monitor patient outcomes, which will guide future trials to greater success. In this review, we consider recent and ongoing clinical trials for a variety of potential retinal gene therapy treatments and discuss the positive and negative issues related to these trials. We discuss the treatment potential following clinical trials as well as the potential risks of some treatments under investigation. As these therapies continue to advance through rigorous testing and regulatory approval processes, they hold the potential to revolutionise the landscape of retinal disorder treatments, providing renewed vision and enhancing the quality of life for countless individuals worldwide.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyRetinal DiseasesGenetic VectorsHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38955952
PMCPMC11349810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.