SynthesisNeurocritical care2024
Safety and Outcome of Admission to Step-Down Level of Care in Patients with Low-Risk Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Golden hour management in the patient with intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhage: an Italian intersociety document.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating type of stroke, and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with a spontaneous ICH are routinely admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, an ICU is a valuable and limited resource, and not all patients may require this level of care. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the safety and outcome of admission to a step-down level of care or stroke unit (SU) compared to intensive care in adult patients with low-risk spontaneous ICH. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials and observational cohort studies. The Mantel-Haenszel method or inverse variance, as applicable, was applied to calculate an overall effect estimate for each outcome by combining the specific risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023481915). The primary outcome examined was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were unfavorable short-term outcome, length of hospital stay, and (re)admission to the ICU. Five retrospective cohort studies involving 1347 patients were included in the qualitative analysis. Two of the studies had severity-matched groups. The definition of low-risk ICH was heterogeneous among the studies. Admission to an SU was associated with a similar rate of mortality compared to admission to an ICU (1.4% vs. 0.6%; RR 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-11.41; P = 0.61), a similar rate of unfavorable short-term outcome (14.6% vs. 19.2%; RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.43-1.36; P = 0.36), and a significantly shorter mean length of stay (standardized mean difference - 0.87 days; 95% CI - 1.15 to - 0.60; P < 0.01). Risk of bias was low to moderate for each outcome. The available literature suggests that a select subgroup of patients with ICH may be safely admitted to the SU without affecting short-term outcome, potentially saving in-hospital resources and reducing length of stay. Further studies are needed to identify specific and reliable characteristics of this subgroup of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38955932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.