ReviewInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024
Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods and Advancements in Predicting Protein Complex Structure.
Review in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- TINA: a geometry-aware post-hoc scoring framework for protein-protein interaction.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Integrating evolutionary signals and predicted protein structure reveals localized molecular divergence in Cereus lineages.Genetica · 2026Article
- Caveat emptor: predicting and modeling protein-DNA recognition and binding via machine-learning computational approaches.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- SAKE-PP: A Spatial-Attention Equivariant Network for Accurate Ranking of Protein-Protein Interaction Models.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Integrative Computational Chemistry Approaches in Modern Drug Discovery: Advances in Docking, Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Dynamics, and Virtual Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Prediction of pre- and postfusion conformations of class I fusion proteins with AlphaFold2.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comprehensive In Silico Analysis of the CXCL12, C55Y Mutation Reveals Structural and Functional Disruption in CXCR4/CXCR7 Signaling.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2026Article
- BridgeNet: a high-efficiency framework integrating sequence and structure for protein and enzyme function prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A Pharmacophore-Based Method for Rapid and Accurate Virtual Screening of Antibody Libraries against Antigens.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- SuperEdgeGO: Edge-supervised graph representation learning for enhanced protein function prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Intermediate Traits in Phylogenetic Genotype-to-Phenotype Studies.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- Overcoming translational barriers in RNA-protein docking: enhancing computational accuracy for targeted drug discovery.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- EM-PLA: environment-aware heterogeneous graph-based multimodal protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Nanobodies: From Discovery to AI-Driven Design.Biology · 2025Review
- Neuroprotective Potential of Free Radical-Scavenging Nanoparticles in Addressing Inflammation and Obesity.IET nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein complexes perform diverse biological functions, and obtaining their three-dimensional structure is critical to understanding and grasping their functions. In many cases, it's not just two proteins interacting to form a dimer; instead, multiple proteins interact to form a multimer. Experimentally resolving protein complex structures can be quite challenging. Recently, there have been efforts and methods that build upon prior predictions of dimer structures to attempt to predict multimer structures. However, in comparison to monomeric protein structure prediction, the accuracy of protein complex structure prediction remains relatively low. This paper provides an overview of recent advancements in efficient computational models for predicting protein complex structures. We introduce protein-protein docking methods in detail and summarize their main ideas, applicable modes, and related information. To enhance prediction accuracy, other critical protein-related information is also integrated, such as predicting interchain residue contact, utilizing experimental data like cryo-EM experiments, and considering protein interactions and non-interactions. In addition, we comprehensively review computational approaches for end-to-end prediction of protein complex structures based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology and describe commonly used datasets and representative evaluation metrics in protein complexes. Finally, we analyze the formidable challenges faced in current protein complex structure prediction tasks, including the structure prediction of heteromeric complex, disordered regions in complex, antibody-antigen complex, and RNA-related complex, as well as the evaluation metrics for complex assessment. We hope that this work will provide comprehensive knowledge of complex structure predictions to contribute to future advanced predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38955920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.