ArticleEmergency radiology2024
Factors affecting radiation dose, radiation exposure time and procedural time in arterial embolization for active hemorrhage.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate patient and procedure-related factors contributing to the radiation dose, cumulative fluoroscopy time (CFT), and procedural time (PT) of Arterial Embolization (AE) for suspected active bleeding.
methodsData on patients who underwent AE for suspected bleeding was retrospectively gathered between January 2019 and April 2022. Data collected included the dependent variables consisting of dose-area product (DAP), CFT, PT, and independent variables consisting of demographic, bleeding-specific, and procedure-specific parameters. All statistical computations were performed in SPSS statistics. The alpha value was set at 0.05.
resultsData from a total of 148 AE were collected with an average patient's age of 61.06 ± 21.57 years. Higher DAP was independently associated with male sex (p < 0.002), age ranges between 46 and 65 years (p = 0.019) and > 66 years (p = 0.027), BMI above 30 (p = 0.016), attending with less than 10 years of experience (p = 0.01), and bleeding in the abdomen and pelvis (p = 0.027). Longer CFT was independently associated with attending with less than 10 years of experience (p < 0.001), having 2 (p = 0.004) or > 3 (p = 0.005) foci of bleed, and age between 46 and 65 years (p = 0.007) and ≥ 66 years (p = 0.017). Longer PT was independently associated with attending with less than 10 years of experience (p < 0.001) and having 2 (p = 0.014) or > 3 (p = 0.005) foci of bleed.
conclusionThe interventionist experience influenced radiation dose, CFT and PT. Dose was also affected by patients' sex, age, BMI, as well as bleeding location. CFT was also affected by patients' age, and both CFT and PT were also affected by the number of bleeding foci. These findings highlight the multifaceted factors that affect radiation dose and procedural time, emphasizing the importance of interventionist expertise, patient's age, sex, BMI, location and number of bleeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38955874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.