ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Acceleration index predicts efficacy of orthostatic training on postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in children.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Recent advances with orthostatic intolerance/tachycardia in children and adolescents: international perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the utility of the acceleration index observed in an electrocardiogram (ECG) for the prediction of the effectiveness of orthostatic training in pediatric patients diagnosed with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). This investigation focused on children diagnosed with POTS and undergoing orthostatic training at the Department of Pediatrics of Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to October 2022. Specifically, patients hospitalized from January 2012 to December 2019 were included in the training set (54 cases), while those hospitalized from January 2020 to October 2022 were included in the external validation set (37 cases). All children received a 3-month orthostatic training, and the baseline symptom score (SS) was calculated in agreement with the pretreatment orthostatic intolerance symptom frequency. Additionally, we determined post-treatment SS during follow-up via telephone after the 3-month treatment. Children with a decrease in post-treatment SS by ≥ 50% of the baseline were considered as responders; otherwise, they were considered as non-responders. Demographic data (age, sex, and body mass index), hemodynamic parameters (supine blood pressure, time to achieve a positive standing test, maximum increase in heart rate during the standing test, maximal heart rate reached during the standing test, and blood pressure at the point of maximal heart rate during the standing test), and electrocardiographic parameters (RR interval in the supine position, shortest RR interval in the upright position, and acceleration index) were collected from all the children prior to treatment. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were conducted to investigate factors associated with the efficacy of orthostatic training. The predictive value of these indicators for the therapeutic effectiveness of orthostatic training in children with POTS was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the indicators were validated using the validation set. Among the 54 children in the training set, 28 responded to orthostatic training, and 26 were nonresponsive. Compared with the non-responders, the responders demonstrated a significant reduction in acceleration index (P < 0.01). The ROC curve for the predictive value of the acceleration index exhibited an area under the curve = 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.685-0.926). With the acceleration index threshold < 27.93%, the sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of orthostatic training efficacy among children with POTS were 85.7% and 69.2%, respectively. The external validation results demonstrated that using acceleration index < 27.93% as the threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of predicting orthostatic training efficacy among children with POTS were 89.5%, 77.8%, and 83.8%, respectively.
conclusionsElectrocardiographic acceleration index can be used to predict the effectiveness of orthostatic training in treating children with POTS. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a chronic orthostatic intolerance involving multiple mechanisms. Autonomic dysfunction is one of the main mechanisms of POTS in children and could be treated with orthostatic training. • In order to improve the efficacy of orthostatic training in children with POTS, it is particularly important to identify the patients with autonomic dysfunction as the main mechanism before the treatment. WHAT IS NEW: • We found acceleration index of the electrocardiogram (ECG) can be used as a satisfactory index to predict the efficacy of orthostatic training in the treatment of POTS in children. • Using the acceleration index to predict the efficacy of orthostatic training on POTS in children is easy to be popularized in hospitals at all levels because it is non-invasive, convenient, and not expensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38955847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.