Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955833›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2024

Revisiting reactive oxygen species production in hypoxia.

Ricardo Alva, Jacob E Wiebe, Jeffrey A Stuart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on nocturnal blood pressure: mechanisms and treatment responses - a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ROS-Responsive Fluorinated Oxalate Nanomedicine for Dual Chemiluminescence/International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. How do cells sense oxygen?Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo AlvaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada. ralvaoropeza@brocku.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9468-0080
Jacob E WiebeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-1833-5479
Jeffrey A StuartDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada. jstuart@brocku.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-0300

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 2020-05274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular responses to hypoxia are crucial in various physiological and pathophysiological contexts and have thus been extensively studied. This has led to a comprehensive understanding of the transcriptional response to hypoxia, which is regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of HIF regulation in hypoxia remain incompletely understood. In particular, there is controversy surrounding the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) in hypoxia and how this affects the stabilization and activity of HIFs. This review examines this controversy and attempts to shed light on its origin. We discuss the role of physioxia versus normoxia as baseline conditions that can affect the subsequent cellular response to hypoxia and highlight the paucity of data on pericellular oxygen levels in most experiments, leading to variable levels of hypoxia that might progress to anoxia over time. We analyze the different outcomes reported in isolated mitochondria, versus intact cells or whole organisms, and evaluate the reliability of various ROS-detecting tools. Finally, we examine the cell-type and context specificity of oxygen's various effects. We conclude that while recent evidence suggests that the effect of hypoxia on ROS production is highly dependent on the cell type and the duration of exposure, efforts should be made to conduct experiments under carefully controlled, physiological microenvironmental conditions in order to rule out potential artifacts and improve reproducibility in research.

Indexed as

MitochondriaReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnimalsCell HypoxiaHumansHypoxiaOxygenOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesArtifactsExperimental conditionsHypoxiaMitochondriaOxygen sensingROS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.