ReviewCurrent microbiology2024
Soil Metaproteomics for Microbial Community Profiling: Methodologies and Challenges.
Review in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Rhizosphere to Resistance: Microbe-Plant Interactions in Eco-Smart Biocontrol.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Diverse microbial metal resistance and novel metal cycling organisms in copper/nickel mine tailings.Metallomics : integrated biometal science · 2026Article
- Unlocking Enzyme Discovery: Leveraging Multi-Omics, Machine Learning, and De Novo Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Proteomic Sample Preparation for the Petroleum Industry: A Biocorrosion Case Study.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
- Metaproteomic Dataset on Semi-Diurnal Variability of the Bacterioplankton Communities During a Spring Phytoplankton Bloom in the North Sea.Proteomics · 2025Article
- Recent Advances and Developments in Bacterial Endophyte Identification and Application: A 20-Year Landscape Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The microbiologist's guide to metaproteomics.iMeta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil represents a complex and dynamic ecosystem, hosting a myriad of microorganisms that coexist and play vital roles in nutrient cycling and organic matter transformation. Among these microorganisms, bacteria and fungi are key members of the microbial community, profoundly influencing the fate of nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon in terrestrial environments. Understanding the intricacies of soil ecosystems and the biological processes orchestrated by microbial communities necessitates a deep dive into their composition and metabolic activities. The advent of next-generation sequencing and 'omics' techniques, such as metagenomics and metaproteomics, has revolutionized our understanding of microbial ecology and the functional dynamics of soil microbial communities. Metagenomics enables the identification of microbial community composition in soil, while metaproteomics sheds light on the current biological functions performed by these communities. However, metaproteomics presents several challenges, both technical and computational. Factors such as the presence of humic acids and variations in extraction methods can influence protein yield, while the absence of high-resolution mass spectrometry and comprehensive protein databases limits the depth of protein identification. Notwithstanding these limitations, metaproteomics remains a potent tool for unraveling the intricate biological processes and functions of soil microbial communities. In this review, we delve into the methodologies and challenges of metaproteomics in soil research, covering aspects such as protein extraction, identification, and bioinformatics analysis. Furthermore, we explore the applications of metaproteomics in soil bioremediation, highlighting its potential in addressing environmental challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38955825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.