Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955536›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2024

The Quantitative Evaluation of Automatic Segmentation in Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Images.

Yao-Wen Liang, Yu-Ting Fang, Ting-Chun Lin, Cheng-Ru Yang, Chih-Chang Chang, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Chin-Chu Ko, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Li-Yu Fay, Jau-Ching Wu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. External validation of SpineNetv2 deep learning system for automated lumbar spine MRI analysis: A multi-pathology diagnostic agreement study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yao-Wen LiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting FangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Chun LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Ru YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Chang ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Kan ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin-Chu KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hsi TuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Yu FayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jau-Ching WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Cheng HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Wei HuBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu County, Taiwan.
You-Yin ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Hung KuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

Taiwan Food and Drug Administration MOHW109-FDA-M-114-000747Taiwan Food and Drug Administration MOHW110-FDA-D-114-000741Taiwan Food and Drug Administration MOHW111-FDA-H-114-000741Taiwan Food and Drug Administration MOHW112-FDAH-114-000741Taiwan Food and Drug Administration MOHW113-FDA-D-113-000741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to overcome challenges in lumbar spine imaging, particularly lumbar spinal stenosis, by developing an automated segmentation model using advanced techniques. Traditional manual measurement and lesion detection methods are limited by subjectivity and inefficiency. The objective is to create an accurate and automated segmentation model that identifies anatomical structures in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging scans.

methodsLeveraging a dataset of 539 lumbar spinal stenosis patients, the study utilizes the residual U-Net for semantic segmentation in sagittal and axial lumbar spine magnetic resonance images. The model, trained to recognize specific tissue categories, employs a geometry algorithm for anatomical structure quantification. Validation metrics, like Intersection over Union (IOU) and Dice coefficients, validate the residual U-Net's segmentation accuracy. A novel rotation matrix approach is introduced for detecting bulging discs, assessing dural sac compression, and measuring yellow ligament thickness.

resultsThe residual U-Net achieves high precision in segmenting lumbar spine structures, with mean IOU values ranging from 0.82 to 0.93 across various tissue categories and views. The automated quantification system provides measurements for intervertebral disc dimensions, dural sac diameter, yellow ligament thickness, and disc hydration. Consistency between training and testing datasets assures the robustness of automated measurements.

conclusionAutomated lumbar spine segmentation with residual U-Net and deep learning exhibits high precision in identifying anatomical structures, facilitating efficient quantification in lumbar spinal stenosis cases. The introduction of a rotation matrix enhances lesion detection, promising improved diagnostic accuracy, and supporting treatment decisions for lumbar spinal stenosis patients.

Indexed as

Automatic segmentationLumbar spineMagnetic resonance imagingResidual U-NetSpinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID38955536
PMCPMC11224749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.