Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955440›Full record

Trial reportSaudi medical journal2024

Patch angioplasty carotid endarterectomy versus eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Haris Vukas, Samra Kadić-Vukas, Dragan Piljić, Haris Vranić, Anes Jogunčić, Edina Đozić, Juš Kšela

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haris VukasFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5061-6661
Samra Kadić-VukasFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dragan PiljićFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Haris VranićFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anes JogunčićFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Edina ĐozićFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Juš KšelaFrom the Department of Vascular Surgery (Vukas H), from the Department of Neurology (Kadić-Vukas), Cantonal Hospital Zenica; from the of Surgery and Department of Neurology (Vukas H, Varnić, Đozić) Sarajevo School of Science of Technology Medical School; from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Piljić), University Clinical Center Tuzla; from the Department of Vascular Surgery (Varnić), General Hospital Sarajevo Abdulah Nakaš; from the Department of Epidemiology (Jogunčić), Public Health Institute of Canton Sarajevo; from the Clinic of Neurology (Đozić), Clinical Center University Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and from the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (Kšela), University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Medical, Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare carotid endarterectomy patch angioplasty (p-CEA) with eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) and associated risks of early cardio-cerebrovascular complications.

methodsThe study was a prospective randomized single-blind trial, monocentric, clinically applicable, descriptive analytical and comparative. From June 2021 to June 2023, 62 consecutive patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery, admitted to our department and randomized into two groups: carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion carotid endarterectomy. Follow-up for 30 days after surgery.

resultsDuring surgery e-CEA, 70% patients had an arrhythmia, and 24 hours after 66.7%, seven days after 46.7% and month after 13.3%. During surgery p-CEA, 33.3% patients had an arrhythmia, 24 hours later 33.3%, 7 days after 13.3% and 30 days after 13.3% patients. Statistically significant difference observed during surgery (Fishers

conclusionThe frequency and categorization of postoperative cardiac arrhythmias after eversion carotid endarterectomy, the clinical implications of various postoperative heart rhythm disturbances and their long-term effects on patients need to be further investigate through sufficiently powered randomized controlled studies.

Indexed as

AngioplastyCarotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidPostoperative ComplicationsAgedArrhythmias, CardiacFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodarrhythmiacarotidendarterectomyeversionPATCH

Identifiers

PMID38955440
PMCPMC11237269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.