ArticleBMJ open2024
How the COVID-19 pandemic affected infant vaccination trends in rural and urban communities in Ibadan, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study compared the infant vaccination trends a year before and a year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in selected urban and rural communities in Ibadan, Nigeria.
designThis was a cross-sectional study in which data were extracted from infant vaccination records.
settingTwo rural and three urban vaccination centres in primary health clinics at Ibadan Southeast and Olúyòlé local government areas, respectively.
participantsInfant vaccination records 1 year before and 1 year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2019-February 2020 and March 2020-February 2021, respectively). OUTCOME MEASURES: Timeliness of vaccination (vaccination taken within 2 weeks of appointment) and vaccination completion according to the Nigerian routine infant vaccination schedule.
results2000 vaccination records were included in the study (1013 (50.6%) for male infants). 840 (42.0%) of the records were from the rural immunisation clinics. There were 1194 (59.7%) and 806 (40.3%) records from before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Before the pandemic, birth dose vaccines were timelier among infants from urban communities, while vaccines given at 6 weeks were timelier in the rural areas. Following the onset of the pandemic, the rural communities had a higher proportion of infants with timelier and complete vaccination except for the birth dose vaccines. Overall, there was higher vaccination completion before the pandemic, and this was higher in the rural compared with the urban communities both before (54.8% vs 11.7%) and after (23.6% vs 1.0%) the onset of the pandemic.
conclusionsA decline in infant vaccination uptake, timeliness and completion persisted 1 year after the COVID-19 pandemic onset, and urban communities were more affected. More efforts are required to ensure optimal infant vaccination, especially in urban communities, to forestall outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.