Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954978›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2024

Community engagement for stakeholder and community trust in healthcare: Short-term evaluation findings from a nationwide initiative in Lao PDR.

Marco J Haenssgen, Elizabeth M Elliott, Sysavanh Phommachanh, Ounkham Souksavanh, Hironori Okabayashi, Shogo Kubota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco J HaenssgenDepartment of Social Science and Development, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Rd. T. Suthep Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. Electronic address: marco.haenssgen@cmu.ac.th.
Elizabeth M ElliottWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, P.O. Box 2932, 1000, Manila, Philippines.
Sysavanh PhommachanhInstitute of Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Payawat Village, Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Ounkham SouksavanhWorld Health Organization Representative, Country Office for Lao People's Democratic Republic, 125 Saphanthong Road, Unit 5 Ban Saphangthongtai, Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Hironori OkabayashiWorld Health Organization Representative, Country Office for Lao People's Democratic Republic, 125 Saphanthong Road, Unit 5 Ban Saphangthongtai, Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Shogo KubotaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, P.O. Box 2932, 1000, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrust remains a critical concept in healthcare provision, but little is known about the ability of health policy and interventions to stimulate more trusting relationships between communities and the health system. The CONNECT (Community Network Engagement for Essential Healthcare and COVID-19 Responses Through Trust) Initiative in Lao PDR provided an opportunity to assess the community-level impact of a trust-building community engagement approach.

methodsA mixed-method process evaluation was implemented from 10/2022-12/2023 among 14 diverse case study communities in four provinces across Lao PDR. Data collection involved two rounds of census surveys (3161 observations incl. panel data from 618 individuals) including an 8-item trust scale, 50 semi-structured interviews with villagers, and 50 contextualizing key informant interviews. The two data collection rounds were implemented before and three months after village-based CONNECT activities and helped discern impacts among activity participants, indirectly exposed villagers, and unexposed villagers in a difference-in-difference analysis.

resultsStakeholders attested strong support for the CONNECT Initiative although community-level retention of trust-related themes from the activities was limited. Quantitative data nevertheless showed that, at endline, the 8-item trust index (from [-8 to +8]) increased by 0.95 points from 4.44 to 5.39 and all trust indicators were universally higher. Difference-in-difference analysis showed that villagers exposed to the CONNECT activities had a 1.02-index-point higher trust index compared to unexposed villagers. Trust impacts improved gradually over time and were relatively more pronounced among men and ethnic minority groups.

conclusionsThe CONNECT Initiative had considerable direct and systemic effects on community members' trust in their local health centers in the short term, which arose from strong stakeholder mobilization and gradual institutional learning. Relational community engagement approaches have the potential to create important synergies in health policy and broader cross-sectorial strategies, but also require contextual grounding to identify locally relevant dimensions of trust.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationCOVID-19TrustAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansLaosMaleMiddle AgedStakeholder ParticipationCommunity engagementHealth systemLao PDRMixed methodsRural areasTrust

Identifiers

PMID38954978
PMCPMC11413521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.