Trial reportBlood advances2024
Prophylactic exchange transfusion in sickle cell disease pregnancy: a TAPS2 feasibility randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03975894 (A Feasibility Trial of Serial Prophylactic Exchange Blood Transfusion in Pregnant Women With Sickle Cell Disease Aiming to Improve Maternal and Infant Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Feasibility Trial of Serial Prophylactic Exchange Blood Transfusion in Pregnant Women With Sickle Cell Disease Aiming to Improve Maternal and Infant Outcomes
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion versus usual care in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Trial
- Echocardiographic and platelet markers of cardiovascular strain in sickle cell disease with superimposed preeclampsia: a perspective.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Proactive management to improve outcomes of high-risk pregnancy in people with sickle cell disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- The right patient, the right treatment: tailoring sickle cell disease care.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- The Economic and Clinical Impact of Recurring Automated Red Blood Cell Exchange to Manage Sickle Cell Disease in the UK.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Prospective cohort study of eDiary acute pain assessments in sickle cell disease during third trimester and postpartum.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Antenatal medication management for women with sickle-cell disease: A systematic review.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes of sickle cell disease in pregnancy: A nationwide study in France.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Thalassemias and Sickle Cell Diseases in Pregnancy: SITE Good Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractSerial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) is increasingly used in sickle cell disease (SCD) pregnancy, despite a lack of robust evidence. The Transfusion Antenatally in Pregnant Women with Sickle Cell Disease (TAPS2) study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definitive randomized controlled trial of SPEBT (intervention) vs standard care (control) in this population. Women aged ≥18 years with SCD, between 6+0 and 18+6 weeks of singleton gestation, were randomized 1:1 every 6 -10 weeks throughout pregnancy in 7 hospitals in England. The main outcomes were recruitment rate (primary outcome), acceptability, and retention. Secondary outcomes were safety and maternal/infant outcomes. In total, 194 women were screened over 42 months (extended because of the pandemic), 88 were eligible, and 35 (39.8%) consented to participate; 18 participants were randomized to intervention, and 17 to control. Follow-up data were collected on all participants. Twelve patients in the intervention group received at least 1 SPEBT, of these, 11 received ≥3. The remaining patient was withdrawn from SPEBT because of transfusion reaction. Sixteen control participants required at least 1 transfusion. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal, infant, and postnatal outcomes. A trend toward a lower incidence of vaso-occlusive crisis, preterm delivery, and improved birthweight was observed in the intervention. The study achieved satisfactory recruitment and retention, confirming its acceptability to participants. TAPS2 demonstrates that it is feasible to perform a definitive international trial of SPEBT in SCD pregnancy. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03975894 and International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (www.isrctn.com; #ISRCTN52684446).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.