Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954687›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Characteristics of surveillance systems for suicide and self-harm: A scoping review.

Aline Conceição Silva, Amanda Sarah Vanzela, Laysa Fernanda Silva Pedrollo, John Baker, José Carlos Marques de Carvalho, Carlos Alberto da Cruz Sequeira, Kelly Graziani Giacchero Vedana, José Carlos Pereira Dos Santos

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intended and suicidal trauma to the anterior neck in Finnish young adults.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aline Conceição SilvaHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing-UICISA: E, Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-2517
Amanda Sarah VanzelaUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirao Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Laysa Fernanda Silva PedrolloUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirao Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
John BakerSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
José Carlos Marques de CarvalhoCINTESIS-Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto Nursing School, Porto, Portugal.
Carlos Alberto da Cruz SequeiraCINTESIS-Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto Nursing School, Porto, Portugal.
Kelly Graziani Giacchero VedanaUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirao Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
José Carlos Pereira Dos SantosHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing-UICISA: E, Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is a complex public health issue. Surveillance systems play a vital role in identifying trends and epidemiologic needs, informing public health strategies, and tailoring effective context-based suicide prevention interventions.

aimTo identify and summarise the characteristics of specific surveillance systems and general health behaviour that include data onsuicide and self-harm.

methodA scoping review following the JBI recommendations and PRISMA-ScR guidelines identified 29 relevant studies on suicide and self-harm surveillance systems. A systematic search was performed on Cinahl, Embase, Lilacs-Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, PubMed-US National Library of Medicine, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The eligibility criteria include papers that use qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods with no restrictions on time or language. The following papers were excluded regarding euthanasia and assisted suicide, as well as papers that did not explicitly describe suicide, self-harm, and surveillance systems. Two researchers independently screened the materials for eligibility and extracted data from the included studies. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis.

resultsTwenty-nine references were included, and 30 surveillance systems were identified and classified into general health behaviour surveillance (n = 15) and specific systems for suicide and self-harm (n = 15). General health behaviour systems often operate at national data collection level, collecting non-fatal data in healthcare settings, mainly emergency departments. The specific systems exhibited greater variability in terms of context, involved actors, data collection level, data collection procedures, and case classification. Limitations found by the studies pointed mostly to case definitions and data quality. Co-production, intersectoral collaboration, clear case definition criteria and data standardisation are essential to improve surveillance systems for suicide and self-harm.

conclusionsThis review identified the characteristics of surveillance systems for suicide and self-harm. Monitoring and evaluation are crucial for ongoing relevance and impact on prevention efforts.

Identifiers

PMID38954687
PMCPMC11218961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.