Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Surgical myomectomy followed by oral Myfembree vs standard of care (SOUL trial): Study protocol for a randomized control trial.

Samar Alkhrait, Ayman Al-Hendy, Hiba Alkelani, Theodore Karrison, Obianuju Sandra Madueke Laveaux

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05538689 (Surgical Myomectomy Followed by Oral Myfembree Versus Standard of Care Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05538689 phase4withdrawnnot on this map

Surgical Myomectomy Followed by Oral Myfembree Versus Standard of Care Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsMetrorrhagia, Pelvic Pain, Menorrhagia, LeiomyomaArmsMyfembree Oral Product
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samar AlkhraitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0001-1349-7621
Ayman Al-HendyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Hiba AlkelaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Theodore KarrisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Obianuju Sandra Madueke LaveauxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1994-2183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine leiomyomas (often referred to as fibroids or myomas) are common benign, hormone-dependent tumors that grow in the uterus and occur in approximately 25% of reproductive age women, depending on selected population. Treatment recommendation is typically based on fibroid size, location, the patient's age, reproductive plans, and obstetrical history. Despite the range of treatment options available for uterine fibroids and their symptoms, including hysterectomy, myomectomy, endometrial ablation, endometrial uterine artery embolization, and magnetic resonance-guided focused-ultrasound surgery, myomectomy remains the gold standard treatment for patients who desire fertility-preserving surgery for their uterine fibroids. Myomectomy, while a prevalent surgical option for the removal of fibroids, carries known risks such as fibroid recurrence, symptom recurrence, and the subsequent need for reintervention. Despite ongoing research and advances in medical treatments for fibroids, there currently are no universally recommended therapeutic interventions proven to effectively delay the recurrence of fibroids or the return of symptoms following this procedure. This situation underscores a significant area of unmet medical need and highlights the importance of continued investigation into preventive strategies and long-term management options for patients undergoing fibroid removal with uterine preservation. We designed a study to assess the efficacy of the new FDA-approved GnRH antagonist, Myfembree in delaying the return of fibroids and their associated symptoms.

methodsA randomized, prospective, open-label clinical trial. The participants (n = 136) will be randomly distributed into two groups. The Control Group (Standard of care) will receive treatment with standard of care (SoC) after surgical myomectomy and the treatment group will receive Relugolix combination therapy (Myfembree®) after surgical myomectomy. The study protocol was approved by the University of Chicago's Institutional Review Board (IRB#22-0282), ensuring that all participants would provide written informed consent before their inclusion. DISCUSSION: In this project, we propose the use of daily dosed Relugolix combination therapy (Relugolix with estradiol and norethindrone acetate), which is approved for uterine fibroids treatment, has the potential to delay the recurrence of fibroid symptoms, prolong the improved quality of life and delay need for re-intervention after uterine sparing surgery.

trial registrationThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Chicago on 9/16/2022 and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT05538689 on Sep 7, 2022. All subjects will provide informed consent to participate.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaStandard of CareUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38954680
PMCPMC11218990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.