Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954596›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Internal Brace Fixation Technique for Lisfranc Injury: A Retrospective Study.

Guanglong Zeng, Qingxiang Xie, Haobo Huang, Limin Cai, Yongcong Li, Xinyuan Liang, Boyuan Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guanglong ZengDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Qingxiang XieDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Haobo HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Limin CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Yongcong LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Xinyuan LiangGraduate School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Boyuan SuDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Dongguan, Guangdong, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Lisfranc ligament is crucial for maintaining the transverse and longitudinal arch of the foot. Owing to the disruption between the medial cuneiform bone and the base of the second metatarsal bone, the currently preferred fixation method remains controversial. Our fixation technique involves screwing one anchor to the medial and intermediate cuneiform bones and using the anchor to carry the ligament to bind the Lisfranc joint and first and second metatarsal joints altogether for elastic fixation. This study evaluated the clinical and functional outcomes of InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 58 patients who underwent InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury between January 2019 and September 2022 by an experienced surgeon. One-way analysis of variance or t test was used. Preoperative classification was performed according to the Myerson classification with imaging data. Postoperative follow-up was performed based on intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Tegner score, and complications. RESULTS Surgery was completed in all patients, and follow-up was performed. The patients' ages ranged from 19 to 62 years (average: 34.6±9.4 years). The postoperative follow-up time was 12-24 months (average: 16.9±3.0 months). The average time for fracture healing was 12.8±3.0 (10-24) weeks. The VAS, AOFAS, and Tegner scores significantly improved postoperatively (from 5.33±1.0 (3-7) to 1.24±0.57 (0-2); 28.02±6.70 (18-51) to 91.59±4.76 (82-96); and 2.40±0.67 (1-4) to 6.53±0.54 (6-7), respectively), which was statistically significant (P<0.01), and the good rate of AOFAS was 91.4%. The postoperative complications were traumatic arthritis, incision infection, and temporary dorsal foot numbness, which gradually recovered. No other rejection reactions or Lisfranc fracture/dislocations recurrence occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury is beneficial for restoring Lisfranc joint stability and function and allows for early and more aggressive rehabilitation for patients, with fewer surgical complications.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalMetatarsal BonesAdultFemaleFoot InjuriesHumansLigaments, ArticularMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38954596
PMCPMC11302241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.