Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2024
Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal failure using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.
Observational study in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolite-based Analysis of High-Risk Factors on Occurrence of AKI in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Gray Zones of Cardiac Troponin Interpretation in the Emergency Department: When Increased Concentrations Do Not Equal Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Best of cardiovascular biomarkers.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025Article
- 99th-Percentile Upper Reference Limit for the New Snibe High-Sensitivity Troponin I Assay in a Southeast Asian Population.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiac Troponin Levels in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: "Markers of High Risk or Just Noise''?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and uncertainties in the diagnosis, treatment, and communication of risk in acute myocardial infarction.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDiagnosing myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is difficult as they often have increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentrations. METHODS AND
resultsObservational US cohort study of emergency department patients undergoing hs-cTnT measurement. Cases with ≥1 hs-cTnT increase > 99th percentile were adjudicated following the Fourth Universal Definition of MI. Diagnostic performance of baseline and serial 2 h hs-cTnT thresholds for ruling-in acute MI was compared between those without and with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The study cohort included 1992 patients, amongst whom 501 (25%) had CKD. There were 75 (15%) and 350 (70%) patients with CKD and 80 (5%) and 351 (24%) without CKD who had acute MI and myocardial injury. In CKD patients with baseline hs-cTnT thresholds of ≥52, >100, >200, or >300 ng/L, positive predictive values (PPVs) for MI were 36% (95% CI 28-45), 53% (95% CI 39-67), 73% (95% CI 50-89), and 80% (95% CI 44-98), and in those without CKD, 61% (95% CI 47-73), 69% (95% CI 49-85), 59% (95% CI 33-82), and 54% (95% CI 25-81). In CKD patients with a 2 h hs-cTnT delta of ≥10, >20, or >30 ng/L, PPVs were 66% (95% CI 51-79), 86% (95% CI 68-96), and 88% (95% CI 68-97), and in those without CKD, 64% (95% CI 50-76), 73% (95% CI 57-86), and 75% (95% CI 58-88).
conclusionDiagnostic performance of standard baseline and serial 2 h hs-cTnT thresholds to rule-in MI is suboptimal in CKD patients. It significantly improves when using higher baseline thresholds and delta values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38954535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.