ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
THRIVE, ASTRAL, and iScore scales for predicting prognosis of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Neurological Severity and Early Imaging Findings Predict 3-Month Functional Outcome in Anterior-Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical multidimensional prediction model for futile reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo validate the predictive performance of the THRIVE, ASTRAL, and iScore scales for clinical functional outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
methodsA total of 111 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this study, with 59 (53.2%) having a good prognosis and 52 (46.8%) having a poor prognosis. MedCalc software was applied to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculate the area under the curve (AUC), and compare the predictive efficacy of the three scales two by two using Delong text. Statistical significance was defined as P
resultsLogistic binary regression multifactorial analysis revealed that iScore is one of the poor predictors of prognosis in patients with MT. The AUC values for the THRIVE, ASTRAL, and iScore scales in predicting prognosis after MT were found to be 0.713, 0.738, and 0.820, respectively.
conclusionThe iScore is a reliable tool for assessing the poor prognosis of MT in patients with AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38954327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.