Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954217›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2024

Durability of Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP)-Controlled, Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in a Real-World European Chronic Pain Population.

Harold Nijhuis, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Johan van de Minkelis, Willem-Jan Hofsté, Lars Elzinga, Philippa Armstrong, Ismaïl Gültuna, Emre Almac, Ganesan Baranidharan, Serge Nikolic and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05272137 (Prospective Data Collection to Evaluate the Feedback Control of the Saluda Medical's Evoke Spinal Cord Stimulation System in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Pain of the Trunk and/or Limbs), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05272137 completednot on this map

Prospective Data Collection to Evaluate the Feedback Control of the Saluda Medical's Evoke Spinal Cord Stimulation System in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Pain of the Trunk and/or Limbs

TypeobservationalSponsorSaluda Medical Pty LtdRan2022 to 2022Enrolled2ConditionsChronic PainArmsEvoke Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Harold NijhuisSt. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands. h.nijhuis@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-0893
Jan-Willem KallewaardRijnstate Hospital, Velp, Netherlands.
Johan van de MinkelisElisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Willem-Jan HofstéSt. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Lars ElzingaBravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
Philippa ArmstrongYork and Scarborough NHS Hospital Trust, York, UK.
Ismaïl GültunaAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Zwijndrecht, Netherlands.
Emre AlmacAlrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.
Ganesan BaranidharanLeeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Serge NikolicSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Ashish GulveJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Jan VesperHeinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Birte E DietzSaluda Medical Europe Ltd, Harrogate, UK.
Dave MuganSaluda Medical Europe Ltd, Harrogate, UK.
Frank J P M HuygenAcademisch Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClosed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) is a recently introduced system that records evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) from the spinal cord elicited by each stimulation pulse and uses this information to automatically adjust the stimulation strength in real time, known as ECAP-controlled SCS. This innovative system compensates for fluctuations in the distance between the epidural leads and the spinal cord by maintaining the neural response (ECAP) at a predetermined target level. This data collection study was designed to assess the performance of the first CL-SCS system in a real-world setting under normal conditions of use in multiple European centers. The study analyzes and presents clinical outcomes and electrophysiological and device data and compares these findings with those reported in earlier pre-market studies of the same system.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in 13 European centers and aimed to gather electrophysiological and device data. The study focused on the real-world application of this system in treating chronic pain affecting the trunk and/or limbs, adhering to standard conditions of use. In addition to collecting and analyzing basic demographic information, the study presents data from the inaugural patient cohort permanently implanted at multiple European centers.

resultsA significant decrease in pain intensity was observed for overall back or leg pain scores (verbal numerical rating score [VNRS]) between baseline (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; n = 135; 8.2 ± 0.1), 3 months (n = 93; 2.3 ± 0.2), 6 months (n = 82; 2.5 ± 0.3), and 12 months (n = 76; 2.5 ± 0.3). Comparison of overall pain relief (%) to the AVALON and EVOKE studies showed no significant differences at 3 and 12 months between the real-world data release (RWE; 71.3%; 69.6%) and the AVALON (71.2%; 73.6%) and EVOKE (78.1%; 76.7%) studies. Further investigation was undertaken to objectively characterize the physiological parameters of SCS therapy in this cohort using the metrics of percent time above ECAP threshold (%), dose ratio, and dose accuracy (µV), according to previously described methods. Results showed that a median of 90% (40.7-99.2) of stimuli were above the ECAP threshold, with a dose ratio of 1.3 (1.1-1.4) and dose accuracy of 4.4 µV (0.0-7.1), based on data from 236, 230, and 254 patients, respectively. Thus, across all three metrics, the majority of patients had objective therapy metrics corresponding to the highest levels of pain relief in previously reported studies (usage over threshold > 80%, dose ratio > 1.2, and error < 10 µV).

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the real-world application of the ECAP-controlled CL-SCS system, highlighting its potential for maintaining effective pain relief and objective neurophysiological therapy metrics at levels seen in randomized control trials, and potential for quantifying patient burden associated with SCS system use via patient-device interaction metrics. CLINICAL

trial registrationIn the Netherlands, the study is duly registered on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Trial NL7889). In Germany, the study is duly registered as NCT05272137 and in the United Kingdom as ISCRTN27710516 and has been reviewed by the ethics committee in both countries.

Indexed as

ChronicClosed-loopECAP-controlled closed-loopElectrophysiologyEvoked compound action potentialNeuropathic painPainPhysiologic closed-loop controlSpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38954217
PMCPMC11393244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.