How to integrate youth in regional sustainability transformation processes: Tools, structures, and effects.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cornelia Fischer *Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180, Vienna, Austria. cornelia.fischer@boku.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-4353

Verena Radinger-Peer *Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Straße 65, 1180, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund CM 400-B COwLEARNINGResearch Department of the Government of Lower Austria K3-F-712/002-2018Universität für Bodenkultur Wien Open access funding

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines young people's involvement in regional sustainability transformation processes based on a real-world experiment in a community of 5700 inhabitants on the southern outskirts of city of Vienna, Austria. The eight-month experiment aimed to explore methods and tools for transdisciplinary co-creation with youth, the impact of structural conditions on their participation and the effects of their integration. Findings highlight the crucial roles of topics relevant to youth, a trusted intermediary like a youth worker, and structural conditions such as political support and resource allocation in enhancing youth engagement success. Collaborative decision making with policymakers and direct communication were also key to effective participation. The real-world experiment laid the groundwork for future participatory methods and had an impact on youth-community relations. It affirmed the role of youth in regional development, with effects that extended beyond the immediate scope of the experiment in terms of time, space, and topic.

Indexed as

Sustainable DevelopmentAdolescentAustriaCommunity ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesDecision MakingHumansYoung AdultIntegrationParticipationParticipatory mappingReal-world experimentReal-world laboratoryTransdisciplinarity

Identifiers

PMID38954144

DOI10.1007/s13280-024-02048-x

PMCPMC11436556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.