Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38954125›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2024

Effects of Two Early Parenting Programmes on Child Aggression and Risk for Violence in Brazil: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Joseph Murray, Rafaela Costa Martins, Melanie Greenland, Suélen Cruz, Elisa Altafim, Adriane Xavier Arteche, Peter J Cooper, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues, Andrea Gonzalez, Adriana Kramer Fiala Machado and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Childhood conduct problems, potential snares in adolescence, and problematic substance use in Brazil.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joseph MurrayHuman Development and Violence Research Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. j.murray@doveresearch.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-3454
Rafaela Costa MartinsHuman Development and Violence Research Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Melanie GreenlandOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Suélen CruzHuman Development and Violence Research Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Elisa AltafimMental Health Postgraduate Program, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriane Xavier ArtechePostgraduate Program in Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Rio Grande Do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Peter J CooperSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Marlos Rodrigues DominguesPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Adriana Kramer Fiala MachadoPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Lynne MurraySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Isabel OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Iná SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Tâmara Biolo SoaresInstituto Cidade Segura, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Luciana Tovo-RodriguesHuman Development and Violence Research Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Merryn VoyseyOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Fondation Botnar 6260Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210735_A_18_Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Violence is a major public health problem globally, with the highest rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the Americas and southern Africa. Parenting programmes in high-income countries can diminish risk for violence, by reducing risk factors such as child aggression and harsh parenting, and increasing protective factors such as child cognitive development and school readiness. However, there is critical need to identify low-cost programmes with replicable benefits that work in real-world LMICs contexts. A three-arm, randomised, single-blind trial evaluated effects of two low-cost, group-based parenting programmes recommended for LMICs (ACT: Raising Safe Kids; DBS: dialogic book-sharing) on child aggression (primary outcome), child development, parenting, maltreatment, and stress. Participants were 369 children with medium-high levels of aggression (mean age 3.1 years at baseline) in poor households. Interventions were implemented in city health and education services in southern Brazil. Maternal reports, filmed observations, child tasks, and hair cortisol were assessed at baseline, 1-month post-intervention, and 8-month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analyses compared each of ACT and DBS with a control group. Three hundred sixty-eight (99.7%) participants completed follow-up assessments 8 months after the interventions. There was no effect of ACT (standardised mean difference, SMD 0.11, 95% CI - 0.05, 0.27) or DBS (SMD 0.05, 95% CI - 0.11, 0.21) on the primary outcome of child aggression. ACT reduced harsh parenting behaviour post-intervention (SMD - 0.23; 95% CI - 0.46, - 0.01), but not at follow-up. DBS improved book-sharing practices at both time points (e.g., maternal sensitivity at follow-up SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.08, 0.57). There were no benefits of either programme for other parenting, child development, or stress outcomes. Two parenting programmes in Brazil had small effects on parenting practices but did not reduce child aggression or several other important risk/protective factors for violence. Effective early interventions that reduce violence in real-world LMIC settings are highly desirable but may be challenging to achieve.

Indexed as

AggressionParentingViolenceBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSingle-Blind MethodAggressionEarly childhoodParenting programmesRandomised control trialViolence

Identifiers

PMID38954125
PMCPMC11322246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.