ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024
Investigation of fingolimod-induced lymphocyte sequestration on inflammatory response and neurological damages after cardiac arrest.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurofilament light chain for assessment of brain injury in four porcine cardiac arrest models.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Novel Finding of Retinal Aneurysmal Alterations in Patients Undergoing Fingolimod Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Carotid intima media thickness, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA sepsis-like syndrome is known to occur after cardiac arrest, leading to cerebral infiltration by white blood cells (WBC). We hypothesized that pharmacological sequestration of WBC, and more specifically lymphocytes within lymphoid tissues, could reduce the cerebral infiltration by these inflammatory cells and subsequent acute brain injury in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Lymphocyte sequestration was induced by the sphingosine-1 phosphate receptors agonist fingolimod.
methodsIn a first set of experiments, anesthetized pigs underwent a sham instrumentation with no cardiac arrest (n = 4). They received an administration of fingolimod (1 mg/kg, i.v.) in order to confirm its effect on WBC. In a second set of experiments, animals randomly received fingolimod or saline two hours prior to an episode of ventricular fibrillation (14 min) with subsequent resuscitation (n = 6 in each group). Neurological injury was assessed 24 h after resuscitation.
resultsIn the first set of experiments, WBC and blood lymphocyte counts were significantly reduced by - 61 ± 10% and - 75 ± 6% two hours after fingolimod administration. In the second set of experiments, blood lymphocyte counts, but not WBC, were also significantly reduced after cardiac arrest in Fingolimod vs Control group. However, most cytokine blood levels were not different among groups, including Interleukin (IL)-1ra, IL-8 or IL-18 blood levels. A difference was only observed for IL-6, which decreased in Fingolimod vs Control (e.g., 5.6 ± 4.8 vs 59.4 ± 20.6 pg/ml at 2 h after cardiac arrest, respectively; p = 0.126). Neurofilament light chain (NFL) blood levels were not different among groups (57 ± 25 vs 84 ± 41 pg/ml in Fingolimod vs Control at 6 h after resuscitation, respectively). After awakening, 3 and 2 animals were prematurely euthanized for ethical reasons due to recurrent seizures in Fingolimod and Control groups, respectively. At Day 1, neurological dysfunction score was not different between groups (87 ± 7 vs 87 ± 5% in Fingolimod vs Control, respectively). Conversely, a decrease in the number of CD3 + cells was observed in the brain of surviving animals in Fingolimod vs Control group (3.10 ± 0.50 vs 7.53 ± 0.57 CD3 + cells/field, respectively; p = 0.0286).
conclusionFingolimod-induced WBC sequestration, and more specifically lymphocytes sequestration, did not improve clinical neurological dysfunction following cardiac arrest although it reduced cerebral infiltration by lymphocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.