ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Chasing the objective upper eyelid symmetry formula; R
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Entropy-Driven Intelligent Diagnosis for SMR Loss of Coolant Accidents: A CNN-LSTM-Attention Hybrid Model for Break Size Assessment.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rapid screening of potent and mechanistically insightful repurposable anticancer drugs targeting EGFR for non-small cell lung cancer: machine learning-aided and structure-guided approach.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Hybrid fuzzy clustering and temporal deep learning framework for multi-parameter forecasting in industrial thermal processes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Data driven multi-stage transformer based framework for intelligent water quality monitoring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvestigate the most appropriate mathematical formula to objectively express upper eyelid contour symmetry.
methods62 eyes of 31 patients were included in the study. The upper eyelid contour symmetry of the patients was classified subjectively (independent of MRD1) as poor, acceptable, and good by three oculoplastic specialists (senior, expert, and junior surgeon). Bézier curves of the upper lid contour were drawn with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). Using the algorithms created by Author SKC in Spyder (Python 3.7.9.), the symmetry of the Bézier curves of the left eyelids were obtained according to the y-axis, and the mid-pupils of both eyes were superimposed. The lower curve moved vertically to the equal height of the other curve to equalize MRD1's. R
resultsThe correlation coefficient of RMSE and MSE were the same for all surgeons grading. There was a strong correlation between the senior surgeon's subjective scoring (N; poor = 8, acceptable = 16, good = 8) and R
conclusionsRMSE, MSE, POC, MAE, and especially R
Indexed as
Identifiers
38954051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.