ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[Click phenomenon in acquired Jaensch-Brown syndrome and trigger finger/thumb: the Notta syndrome].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric trigger thumb treated with A1 pulley release with or without postoperative thumb immobilization: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical featuresThe click phenomenon occurs when an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or of the extension of the finger/thumb, is forcefully overcome. The common cause is a nodule either of the superior oblique tendon posterior to the trochlea in the case of a Jaensch-Brown syndrome or of the digital flexor tendon anterior to the A1 annular pulley in the case of a trigger finger. Both locations share similar anatomical conditions for the development of the nodule and the pathomechanism of the click.
resultsFrom these identical findings in the eye and the hand in small children it can be assumed that the results from the studies of the hand in newborns and infants with a trigger thumb/finger are also applicable to the situation of the eye. 1. This motility disorder is not congenital. This is most likely due to an incomplete development at the time of birth of the sliding factors needed for a free passage of the tendon through the trochlea and the A1 annular pulley. 2. A distinction must be made between stages 0-3: stage 0 = no more restriction of the motility and no click phenomenon; stage 1 = forced active extension/elevation possible; stage 2 = only passive extension/elevation, each with a click phenomenon; stage 3 = no extension/elevation possible and no click phenomenon. 3. In most cases in early childhood there is a spontaneous complete recovery (75% after 6-7 years). In the eye this spontaneous course can only limitedly be shortened with motility exercises in combination with segmental occlusion.
conclusionThe click phenomenon is a symptom of stages 1 and 2 of an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or the extension of the finger/thumb. It should not be called a syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38953924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.