Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953919›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024

Evaluation and clinical application of a bracketing calibration-based isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference measurement procedure for serum theophylline.

Yuanyuan Du, Qiaofang Yan, Min Zhan, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Di Huang, Pengwei Zhang, Jun Yan, Jianbing Wang, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuanyuan DuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Qiaofang YanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Min ZhanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Qiaoxuan ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Di HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Pengwei ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jun YanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jianbing WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China. wangjianbing625@163.com.
Xianzhang HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China. huangxz020@163.com.
Liqiao HanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China. hanliqiao@gzucm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-9966

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515220149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for serum theophylline via isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed. With a single-step precipitation pretreatment and a 6-min gradient elution, the method achieved baseline separation of theophylline and its analogs on a C18-packed column. A bracketing calibration method was used to ensure repeatable signal intensity and high measurement precision. The intra-assay and inter-assay imprecisions were 1.06%, 0.84%, 0.72% and 0.47%, 0.41%, 0.25% at concentrations of 4.22 µg/mL (23.40 µmol/L), 8.45 µg/mL (46.90 µmol/L), and 15.21 µg/mL (84.43 µmol/L), respectively. Recoveries ranged from 99.35 to 102.34%. The limit of detection (LoD) was 2 ng/mL, and the lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 5 ng/mL. The linearity range extended from 0.47 to 60 µg/mL (2.61-333.04 µmol/L). No ion suppression and carry-over (< 0.68%) were observed. The relative bias for this candidate RMP that participated in 2023 External Quality Control for Reference Laboratories (RELA) conducted by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) was within a range of 0.17 to 0.93%. Furthermore, two clinical immunoassay systems were compared with this candidate RMP, demonstrating good correlations. The results of the Trueness Verification Plan indicate significant differences among routine systems, highlighting the need for standardization efforts. The developed candidate RMP for serum theophylline serves as a precise reference baseline for standardizing clinical systems and assigning values to reference materials.

Indexed as

Limit of DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryTheophyllineCalibrationChromatography, LiquidHumansIndicator Dilution TechniquesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsTheophyllineCandidate reference measurement procedureID-LC-MS/MSStandardizationTheophyllineTherapeutic drug monitoringTrueness Verification Plan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.