ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2024
Trends in Memory Function and Memory Impairment Among Older Adults in the United States and Europe, 1996-2018.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross national comparison of memory function before and after a cancer diagnosis in the United States and England.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Trajectories of episodic memory in midlife: Historical change from a cross-country perspective.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Introduction to Supplement on Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Dementia and Related Population Health Trends.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Addressing Practice Effects in Population-Based Studies of Trends in Late-Life Dementia and Cognitive Impairment.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Closing the Data Gaps on Trends in Dementia and Related Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-country studies document varying time trends in memory function and impairment. Comparative analyses are limited.
methodsWe used self-respondent data on adults aged 50+ years in 13 countries from 3 surveys (United States: Health and Retirement Study, 1998-2018; England: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, 2002-2018; 11 European countries: Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, 2004-2019). Memory is measured with tests of immediate and delayed word recall. Unweighted age- and gender-adjusted mixed effects regression models as well as models with adjustments for additional sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviors were examined. Heterogeneity in trends by gender, age group, and educational attainment was measured.
resultsThe age-adjusted 10-year improvement in average test score is 0.04 standard deviations (SDs) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.05) in the United States, 0.17 SDs (95% CI: 0.15, 0.19) in England, and 0.24 SDs (95% CI: 0.23, 0.25) in SHARE countries. Trends are largely similar across gender, age groups, and educational attainment. Regional differences in trends remain after adjustment for potential mechanisms. The difference between the United States and other countries is particularly large under 75 years of age compared to 75 years and older.
conclusionsPace of improvement in memory function varies strongly across countries. On average, the 11 European countries studied had the fastest improvement, followed by England. The trend in the United States indicates improvement, but at a much slower pace compared to that in England and other European countries. Uncovering the causes for the cross-country heterogeneity in time trends, and in particular the reasons for the comparatively poor performance of the United States, should be both a research and public health priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.