Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953514›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Experiences of Self-Sampling and Future Screening Preferences in Non-Attenders Who Returned an HPV Vaginal Self-Sample in the YouScreen Study: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Questionnaire.

Hannah Drysdale, Laura A V Marlow, Anita Lim, Jo Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Use of First-Void Urine to Screen Women Aged 60-79 for HPV in the UK: The Catch-Up Screen Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Urine human papillomavirus testing for cervical screening in a UK general screening population: a diagnostic test accuracy study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah DrysdaleCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-6166
Laura A V MarlowCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-2397
Anita LimCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-7451
Jo WallerCancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4025-9132

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17219Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219Cancer Research UK C8162/A16892Cancer Research UK C8162/A25356Cancer Research UK C8162/A27047University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed experiences of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaginal self-sampling and future screening preferences in an ethnically and socio-economically diverse group of women overdue for cervical screening. SETTING AND

participantsA postal questionnaire was embedded in the YouScreen self-sampling trial in England: 32.5% (2712/8338) of kit completers returned the survey. Kit non-completers were encouraged to return a questionnaire, but no responses were received. Participants were ethnically diverse (40.3% came from ethnic minority backgrounds), and 59.1% came from the two most deprived quintiles. Differences in confidence in kit completion, trust in the test results and intention to attend a follow-up test if HPV-positive were evaluated using Pearson's χ

resultsMost kit-completers reported high confidence in self-sampling (82.6%) and high trust in the results (79.9%), but experiences varied by ethnicity and screening status. Most free-text comments were positive but some reported difficulties using the device, pain or discomfort. Most women would opt for self-sampling in the future (71.3% vs. 10.4% for a clinician-taken test) and it was more often preferred by ethnic minority groups, overdue screeners and never attenders. Urine self-tests were preferred to vaginal tests (41.9% vs. 15.4%), especially among women from Asian, Black or Other Ethnic backgrounds.

conclusionsKit-completers were confident, found the test easy to complete, and trusted the self-sample results. However, experiences varied by ethnic group and some women highlighted difficulties with the kit. Most women would prefer self-sampling in the future, but it was not a universal preference, so offering a choice will be important. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We did not have direct patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in the questionnaire design. However, patients and public representatives did input into the design of the YouScreen trial and reviewed the wider study materials (e.g. participant information sheet).

trial registrationThis questionnaire study was embedded in the YouScreen trial. The protocol for the YouScreen trial is available at https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12759467. The National Institute for Health Research 43 Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS) ID is 4441934.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEnglandFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSelf CareSpecimen HandlingSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smearscervical screeningconfidenceHPV vaginal self‐samplingscreening non‐attendersscreening preferencestrust

Identifiers

PMID38953514
PMCPMC11217896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.