Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953510›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2024

Recent developments in the management of resistant hypertension: focus on endothelin receptor antagonists.

Sayeh Heidari Nejad, Omar Azzam, Markus P Schlaich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sayeh Heidari NejadDobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School - Royal Perth Hospital Unit & RPH Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Omar AzzamDobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School - Royal Perth Hospital Unit & RPH Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-2062
Markus P SchlaichDobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School - Royal Perth Hospital Unit & RPH Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-0195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistant hypertension is characterized by the inability of guideline-recommended triple combination therapy to control blood pressure (BP) to target. It is associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Despite abundant preclinical evidence supporting the critical role of the endothelin pathway in resistant hypertension (RH), clinical implementation of endothelin antagonists for the treatment of hypertension was hindered by various factors. Recently, the novel dual endothelin-receptor antagonist aprocitentan was tested in individuals with resistant hypertension in the PRECISION trial and provided compelling evidence supporting both short and longer-term safety and clinically meaningful and sustained BP lowering efficacy. These findings resulted in the recent regulatory approval of aprocitentan by the FDA. Aprocitentan may be a particularly useful antihypertensive option for individuals with advanced age, chronic kidney disease, and albuminuria.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsHypertensionBlood PressureDrug ResistanceHumansPyrimidinesSulfonamidesAntihypertensive AgentsaprocitentanEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesaprocitentanblood pressurechronic kidney diseaseendothelinendothelin receptor antagonistresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID38953510
PMCPMC11486316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.