ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Deep Learning Enhanced Label-Free Action Potential Detection Using Plasmonic-Based Electrochemical Impedance Microscopy.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Detection of Cellular Signals at Material Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- MXene Nanomaterial Interfaces: Pioneering Neural Signal Recording for Brain-Computer Interfaces and Cognitive Therapy.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2026Review
- High-performance terahertz biosensor utilizing a hybrid one-dimensional photonic crystal with liquid crystal and graphene components.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring neuronal electrical activity, such as action potential propagation in cells, requires the sensitive detection of the weak electrical signal with high spatial and temporal resolution. None of the existing tools can fulfill this need. Recently, plasmonic-based electrochemical impedance microscopy (P-EIM) was demonstrated for the label-free mapping of the ignition and propagation of action potentials in neuron cells with subcellular resolution. However, limited by the signal-to-noise ratio in the high-speed P-EIM video, action potential mapping was achieved by averaging 90 cycles of signals. Such extensive averaging is not desired and may not always be feasible due to factors such as neuronal desensitization. In this study, we utilized advanced signal processing techniques to detect action potentials in P-EIM extracted signals with fewer averaged cycles. Matched filtering successfully detected action potential signals with as few as averaging five cycles of signals. Long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network achieved the best performance and was able to detect single-cycle stimulated action potential successfully [satisfactory area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) equal to 0.855]. Therefore, we show that deep learning-based signal processing can dramatically improve the usability of P-EIM mapping of neuronal electrical signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.